11 Best Zluri Alternatives for 2026 [According to User Reviews]

Zluri answers the SaaS sprawl question well. Plug it into your identity provider and finance tools, and you’ll finally know what apps your company is running (even the ones that bypassed IT entirely).

The trouble starts when you need to act on what you’ve found. Seeing that 200 people have Salesforce access is a starting point. Knowing which of them can bulk-export your customer database, and whether they should still have that ability, is equally important.

That’s where Zluri’s coverage thins out according to multiple G2 reviews and Reddit discussions. That’s why we outlined 11 alternatives that companies switch to when they’ve outgrown visibility-only tooling.

Why look for an alternative to Zluri?

Zluri gets the job done for SaaS operation discovery and basic license management, but for a lot of teams, that’s only a small part of the picture. When you need tighter access controls, a wider range of integrations, or a cleaner user experience, the gaps become harder to ignore.

Spend a few minutes in the G2 reviews, and you’ll see the same pain points:

• Jack-of-all-trades problem: Some users say Zluri attempts to do everything at the cost of doing any one area really well. It’s a platform that’s still finding its footing, and the pain points don’t take long to surface. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Patches take a while: Bugs happen with any platform, but some users say that Zluri’s fixes can be a bit too slow. If you’re relying on the platform every day, that can get frustrating. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Not the fastest to set up: The initial setup isn’t exactly plug and play, especially if you’re connecting a lot of tools. And once you’re up and running, some dashboards lag behind, so real-time insights aren’t always there when you need them. [Read Full G2 Review]
• UI isn’t intuitive: A few users mention that the UI doesn’t guide you through tasks the way you’d expect. It’s not the most intuitive experience, especially if you’re new to the platform. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Shallow integration coverage: One complaint that comes up a lot in reviews is the need for more ready-to-use integrations. If your stack doesn’t line up with what Zluri supports, you’ll feel the gaps pretty quickly. [Read Full G2 Review]

Key features and functionalities to look for in a Zluri alternative

Different teams leave Zluri for different reasons, but the features they look for next tend to overlap. Whether your priority is governance, integrations, or usability, these are the capabilities that tend to matter most when evaluating alternatives:

• Granular access insights: Knowing an app exists is step one. You also need to see what each user can do inside it, down to the specific permissions and whether those permissions still match their role.
• Just-in-time access: Standing access is a liability. Look for platforms that let users request temporary, time-bound permissions that expire automatically, so you’re not cleaning up forgotten access months later.
• Joiner-mover-leaver automation: When someone joins, changes roles, or leaves, their access should update automatically. Manual onboarding and offboarding don’t scale and leave gaps that auditors will find.
• Automated access reviews: Access piles up over time, and manual reviews don’t scale. Look for a platform that runs recurring reviews, flags issues automatically, and routes them to the right people.
• One-click remediation: Spotting a problem is only half the job. The platform should let you revoke, adjust, or downgrade access quickly, across multiple apps if needed, without filing tickets or waiting on IT.
• Out-of-the-box integrations: Your stack probably includes more than just the “big name” tools. Look for a wide library of prebuilt connectors, so you’re not stuck building custom integrations or waiting months for support.
• Audit-ready reporting: When auditors come knocking, you need access logs, certification records, and permission histories ready to go. The platform should generate this evidence without manual assembly.
• Non-human identity support: Users aren’t the only identities in your environment. API keys, service accounts, and tokens often outnumber employees. Look for platforms that can discover and govern these too.

Top 11 alternatives to Zluri on the market today

Zluri’s biggest drawback is that it tries to fit several different tools into one, so the competitors don’t all line up the same way. We sorted these 11 alternatives into 4 categories to help you find the one that fits your situation.

Identity governance & access platforms (IGA)

If your only goal is to get a handle on your SaaS stack and rein in license costs, Zluri can get the job done.

But if your team has moved on to deeper identity governance, like granular access controls, automated reviews, and policy enforcement, you’ll want something built with that in mind.

These are the IGA alternatives that might suit your company better:

1. ConductorOne

ConductorOne is an AI-native identity governance platform built for security and IT teams who need more than visibility. The platform automates access reviews, flags excessive permissions and separation-of-duty conflicts, and governs the full spectrum of identities (including employees, contractors, service accounts, and AI agents).

ConductorOne is powered by AI and automation. Access reviews that used to take hours now run with intelligent task routing, risk-based recommendations, and automated reporting. Routine access requests can be handled end-to-end without human intervention.

Where Zluri focuses on SaaS discovery and spend optimization, ConductorOne goes deeper into governance and remediation. The platform deploys in days with 300+ pre-built connectors and fast, no-code options for custom integrations. Once connected, the unified identity graph pulls access data from every source and maps it into a single, queriable view.

Key features

• 300+ pre-built connectors with no-code customization: Connects to SaaS apps, cloud and on-prem infrastructure, directories, HR systems, and legacy tools out of the box, and the no-code options cover homegrown and niche applications.
• Full identity lifecycle automation: Syncs with HR systems and automates workflows that provision accounts on day one, adjust permissions when roles change, and revoke access the moment someone leaves.
• Intelligent access reviews: Reviews are automated from end to end, and built-in AI agents can be tasked with handling routine certifications, highlighting only the decisions that need human judgment.
• Non-human identity governance: Discovers and catalogs service accounts, API keys, OAuth tokens, and AI agents across your environment, and each one maps back to a human owner.
• Just-in-time access with automatic expiration: Users request temporary access through Slack, MS Teams, or the web app. The platform grants time-limited permissions and revokes them automatically when the window closes.
• Unified Identity Graph: ConductorOne aggregates identity and entitlement data from every connected system into a single view. Security teams can understand and visualize who has access to what, how they got it, and whether it still makes sense.

Why are companies choosing ConductorOne over Zluri

• Governance depth rather than SaaS visibility: Zluri focuses on SaaS visibility and cost optimization, which works great if that’s your main problem. ConductorOne handles the governance layer, with access reviews, least privilege enforcement, and separation-of-duties controls that keep compliance teams satisfied.
• Full identity coverage, including non-human identities: ConductorOne governs service accounts, API keys, OAuth tokens, and AI agents alongside human users. Zluri focuses solely on people and software licenses, which leaves non-human identities out of scope entirely.
• Just-in-time access that expires automatically: ConductorOne gives users a way to request temporary access that disappears on its own once the time limit hits. Zluri can provision and deprovision users, but it wasn’t built around the same temporary access model for reducing standing privileges.
• 300+ connectors across SaaS, infrastructure, and legacy systems: ConductorOne connects to AWS, Azure, GCP, databases, and on-prem systems through 300+ connectors. Zluri leans toward SaaS, with less depth for infrastructure access control.

What real customers are saying about ConductorOne

Companies using ConductorOne tend to finish reviews faster, spend less time on access requests, and face audits with more confidence.

For example, Ramp was burning 40 to 50 hours per quarter on manual data collection for access reviews. ConductorOne brought that down to a few hours and reduced IT effort on access requests by 95%.

“Another huge win for me is the overall visibility. It’s so helpful to have one place to check access across hundreds of systems. I don’t have to log into ten different places to figure out who has access to what – I can just go to ConductorOne.” — Paul Yoo, Head of Security Assurance

At PriceSmart, the challenge was governing access with a 30-year-old IBM iSeries system alongside modern cloud tools. After deploying ConductorOne, the retail company reduced quarterly review cycles from three months to under three weeks and brought manager review time down from hours to less than 30 minutes.

DigitalOcean needed a way to keep up with SOC 2 and SOX requirements without drowning in spreadsheets every quarter. ConductorOne brought them to 100% on-time review completion and reduced the effort involved by 85%.

2. Lumos

Lumos is an autonomous identity governance platform that automates access reviews, user lifecycle management, and SaaS allocation optimization.

Companies use Lumos to manage access at scale, and the platform connects to over 300 SaaS applications, identity providers, and enterprise systems out of the box.

Key features

• Automated access reviews: Lumos’s AI agent, Albus, can be used to run user access reviews by analyzing user entitlements, SaaS usage patterns, and peer group comparisons.
• Joiner-mover-leaver automation: The platform automates the entire employee lifecycle by connecting to your HRIS and identity providers. When someone joins, changes roles, or leaves, Lumos triggers the right provisioning workflows.
• SaaS spend optimization: Lumos can find unused licenses, shadow IT, and duplicate tools across your environment. When it finds an app, it can reclaim licenses on its own and flag upcoming contract renewals before you overpay.

Limitations

• Cloud infrastructure integrations are missing: Lumos works well for SaaS apps, but it doesn’t currently support access management for AWS, GCP, or Azure. If your business needs are to govern cloud infrastructure access, you’ll likely need a separate tool. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Technical support can be frustrating: Some users say that getting help through technical support isn’t always a smooth experience. If you run into issues, expect some friction along the way. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Lacks a user-friendly interface: A few reviewers mention that the interface doesn’t always make it obvious what access a user already has. It can take some digging to see existing permissions at a glance. [Read Full G2 Review]

Pricing

Lumos doesn’t publish pricing on its website, so you’ll need to contact its sales team for a quote. Pricing is custom and depends on user count, features, and how you plan to deploy it.

Learn more → 11 Top-Rated Lumos Alternatives for 2026 - ConductorOne

3. SailPoint

SailPoint is one of the most popular names in identity governance. The platform helps companies automate access reviews, enforce least-privilege policies, and keep up with compliance rules.

It’s available as an on-prem solution (IdentityIvQ) or a cloud offering (Identity Security Cloud), and it’s a common choice in industries like finance and healthcare where regulatory scrutiny is high.

Key features

• Hundreds of connectors: The platform connects to thousands of apps, directories, and cloud services through pre-built connectors.
• Identity lifecycle automation: The platform handles provisioning, role changes, and offboarding automatically, with automated workflows that can flex to fit complex org structures.

Limitations

• Support difficulty: Users say the support team is often reluctant to hop on a call, even for issues that could be sorted out in a few minutes. [Read Full G2 Review]
• The UI lacks basic features: Reviewers mention that the interface is missing features you’d expect, like sorting or searching for access certifications. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Error messages aren’t very descriptive: When something goes wrong, the messages don’t always tell you the exact disruption. You may end up spending more time than expected tracking down the root cause. [Read Full G2 Review]

Pricing

SailPoint doesn’t make pricing public, so you’ll need to talk to their sales team for specifics. What we do know is that licensing is based on identity count, selected modules, and deployment type.

Learn more → 10 Best SailPoint Alternatives (Rated by User Reviews) - ConductorOne

SaaSOps & IT automation platforms

If your priority is automating the day-to-day work of IT, things like onboarding, offboarding, and license cleanup, these platforms are built for that. They’re less focused on deep identity governance and more on keeping IT operations running smoothly with less manual effort.

4. BetterCloud

BetterCloud is a SaaS management platform that connects to your cloud applications via APIs to handle onboarding, offboarding, and everything in between.

The platform integrates with HRIS systems, identity providers, and ITSM tools, and offers a no-code workflow builder for teams that don’t want to rely on custom scripts.

Key features

• No-code workflow automation: BetterCloud lets you build complex workflows with a drag-and-drop builder. Onboarding, offboarding, and mid-lifecycle changes can all run automatically based on triggers from your HRIS or identity provider.
• SaaS spend optimization: The platform tracks license usage across your stack, flags underused subscriptions, and helps you reclaim licenses before renewal.
• Deep Google Workspace integration: If your organization runs on Google Workspace, BetterCloud gives you more control than the native admin console. You get more actionable insights into user activity, more flexible permission settings, and tighter security configs.

Limitations

• No audit support for Google Drives: If your team uses Google Shared Drives for collaboration, you won’t be able to audit them through BetterCloud. That’s a notable gap for organizations that depend on shared storage. ** ** [Read Full G2 Review]
• Email signature limit: There’s a 50-user limit on email signatures, and no option to apply rules at the group level. It brings unnecessary overhead if you need consistency across a bigger team. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Pay-per-integration pricing model: Each app connection comes with an extra cost, which can get expensive if you have a broad SaaS stack. [Read Full G2 Review]

Pricing

Like most platforms in this category, BetterCloud keeps its pricing behind a “get a quote” wall. The platform has three tiers:

• Discover+Platform for SaaS discovery, cost savings, and tracking
• Manage+Platform for automating onboarding and offboarding
• Secure+Platform for cloud file governance and DLP

Based on third-party data, expect somewhere in the $3 to $10 per user per month range. You can also try the Spend Optimization and File Governance modules for free before you commit.

5. Torii

Torii is a SaaS management tool that combines app discovery, spend optimization, and workflow automation into a single system for IT, finance, and security teams.

The platform connects to identity providers, finance tools, and browser extensions to build a real-time inventory of every application in your environment.

Key features

• AI-powered application discovery: Torii runs in the background and finds apps you didn’t know existed. It pulls data from browser extensions, SSO logs, and finance tools to build complete visibility of your stack.
• No-code workflow automation: Workflows are visual and don’t need code. You can set up branching logic, connect to real-time events, and route approvals through Slack.
• Automated lifecycle management: When employees join, change roles, or leave, Torii picks up the signal from your HRIS or IdP and triggers the right workflow automatically.

Limitations

• Integration coverage has gaps: Some reviewers want more integrations with additional platforms. Depending on your stack, you might find that certain tools aren’t supported yet. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Usage tracking is unreliable: The “last used” data leans on Okta session info, which isn’t the same as actual in-app activity. Someone can authenticate without really using the app, or use it without going through SSO every time. [Read Full G2 Review]
• AI features can be inconsistent: AI-powered features can be hit or miss. When they don’t work, you’re back to entering data by hand. [Read Full G2 Review]

Pricing

Torii doesn’t list pricing on its website. We checked their official pricing page, and both solutions (Identity Governance & Administration and SaaS Management Platform) require a custom quote.

SaaS spend & asset management platforms (SMP)

SaaS spend and access governance are related, but they are not the same problem.

Managing SaaS sprawl and budget leakage still matters. SaaS management platforms are designed to help you discover every application in your environment, understand where money is being spent, and eliminate unused or redundant licenses. If cost optimization is your primary concern, these tools can be effective.

But as AI agents, automations, and non-human identities take on real work inside those applications, spend visibility alone is no longer enough. SaaS management tools don’t govern who or what can actually do things inside each app. They don’t define permissions, enforce policies, or control how access is granted, used, and revoked.

In an environment where software is acting on your behalf, governance becomes essential. Knowing what you pay for is useful. Knowing who or what has the power to act is critical. Some commonly used SMPs:

6. Zylo

Zylo is one of the leading SaaS management platforms, though it’s built more for finance and procurement teams than for identity governance.

If your main concern is visibility into SaaS spend and making sure you’re not overpaying for licenses, Zylo might be a solid fit.

Key features

• Pricing benchmark data: Zylo manages over $40 billion in SaaS spend. You can see how your pricing compares to similar organizations and use that information when it’s time to negotiate or renew.
• AI discovery engine: Zylo automatically discovers and categorizes every application in your stack, even the ones that slipped through without approval.
• Done-for-you negotiations: You can hand off vendor management to Zylo’s team if you don’t want to manage it internally.

Limitations

• Workflow emails can look suspicious: There’s limited customization for workflow emails, so they can come across as sketchy to recipients. A few reviewers mentioned low response rates because of this. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Limited control over data visibility: There are some limitations around how you can display information. You can customize certain fields, but getting that information in front of the right people isn’t always straightforward. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Expect some data cleanup: The platform ingests a huge amount of information, which can lead to some data hygiene issues. Plan on doing regular cleanup to keep everything accurate. [Read Full G2 Review]

Pricing

Zylo doesn’t list specific pricing, but the cost typically depends on employee count, total SaaS spend, and which tier you select. The platform is built for mid-market and enterprise organizations, so you can expect pricing to be in that range.

7. Productiv

Productiv is another common SMP that tracks engagement at a more granular level compared to Zluri and Zylo. It connects directly to the app’s APIs and monitors engagement over 50+ dimensions, including feature-level activity, session depth, and team-based adoption patterns.

Key features

• Feature-level usage analytics: Instead of relying on login data, Productiv pulls engagement metrics directly from app APIs. That gives you a clearer picture of what’s being used, by whom, and how often.
• Streamlined app requests: Centralizes how software gets requested and approved across the organization. This way, your IT has insight into every request, but the process doesn’t slow down waiting on them.
• Usage-informed decisions: The platform brings usage history into the renewal process so you can see what’s worth keeping (and what isn’t).

Limitations

• Slow support responses: Getting help through support isn’t exactly quick. The team appears to operate outside US hours, so if you need a quick answer, you may have better luck going through your CSM. ** ** [Read Full G2 Review]
• Steep learning curve: The platform packs in a lot of data, which can feel overwhelming at first. Reviewers mention that onboarding new team members takes time, and even experienced users don’t always feel confident running deeper analysis. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Data refresh timing is unpredictable: Connectors don’t sync as frequently as some competitors, and there’s no clear schedule for when data gets refreshed. [Read Full G2 Review]

Pricing

Productiv doesn’t list pricing publicly. Based on the available information, it’s primarily built for mid-market and enterprise buyers, and costs likely scale with company size and the amount of SaaS spend you’re managing.

You’ll need to reach out to sales for a custom quote, and you can get a demo through their website.

8. Nudge Security

Nudge Security is a security-first SaaS management platform that discovers cloud applications through a patented email-based method.

The platform doesn’t rely on integrations or network monitoring. It scans machine-generated messages in Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace to surface every app anyone has ever signed up for.

Key features

• Historical spend visibility: Analyzes two years of invoice and billing emails to find SaaS spend that bypassed SaaS procurement. It also flags inactive accounts and redundant subscriptions.
• Supply chain breach alerts: The platform monitors security posture for thousands of vendors and sends alerts when a provider experiences a breach.
• Automated nudges and playbooks: Nudge reaches out to employees automatically when they sign up for new apps. Pre-built playbooks streamline access reviews, SSO enrollment, and offboarding.

Limitations

• Still building out the feature set: Nudge Security is newer to the market than some competitors, so there are certain basic features that are not yet available. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Inaccurate contact assignments: Nudge identifies technical contacts for each discovered app, but the assignments aren’t always accurate. Users often end up reassigning ownership manually to the right stakeholders. [Read Full G2 Review]
• No enforcement controls: Nudge Security doesn’t block or restrict access to applications. The platform relies on “nudges” to encourage users toward better security practices, but if employees ignore the prompts, there’s no mechanism to force compliance.

Pricing

Nudge Security starts at $5 per active user account per month for mid-sized teams, with a $750 flat rate for smaller organizations and custom enterprise pricing for larger deployments.

Advanced integration capabilities that harden security posture on critical apps are available as an add-on at $50 per app per month. Also, there’s a 14-day free trial.

Identity providers (IdPs)

IdPs aren’t competing with Zluri directly. They handle authentication and single sign-on, not SaaS discovery or spend tracking.

But if you’re reassessing your identity stack as a whole, or looking for a foundation that access governance tools can plug into, these platforms can be worth a look.

9. Okta

Okta Workforce Identity is a cloud-native IdP platform that handles authentication, SSO, and user lifecycle automation for employees, contractors, and partners.

The platform connects to over 7,000 pre-built integrations through the Okta Integration Network, so it works as a natural control layer for companies with large SaaS footprints.

Key features

• Single sign-on with 7,000+ integrations: Users authenticate once and access cloud, on-prem, and mobile apps without reentering credentials. The Okta Integration Network covers most major SaaS tools out of the box.
• Adaptive multi-factor authentication: Policies adjust based on user location, device, and behavior. Supports phishing-resistant methods like FIDO2, biometrics, and hardware keys.
• Universal directory: Pulls user profiles from Active Directory, LDAP, HR systems, and other sources into one centralized directory.

Limitations

• Difficult on-prem integrations: Connecting to Active Directory or LDAP isn’t plug-and-play. You need careful configuration to get everything synced properly. ** ** [Read Full G2 Review]
• Unreliable email OTP delivery: Email-based OTPs sometimes arrive late or end up in spam, which leaves users stuck waiting when they need access fast. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Time-consuming admin UI: Too many menus and submenus to dig through. IT teams report spending more time than they’d like just finding the right settings. [Read Full G2 Review]

Pricing

Okta uses suite-based pricing billed annually on a per-user basis. Starter begins at $6 per user per month, Essentials at $17. Professional and Enterprise tiers are custom-quoted.

All plans require a $1,500 annual minimum, and products like SSO, MFA, and Lifecycle Management can also be purchased individually if you don’t need the full suite.

Learn more → 8 Best Okta Identity Governance Alternatives for 2026

10. Microsoft Entra ID

Microsoft Entra ID is Microsoft’s cloud-native identity and access management platform, formerly known as Azure Active Directory. It handles SSO, MFA, conditional access, and lifecycle automation across cloud and on-premises environments.

Entra is a good choice for teams that are already invested in Microsoft 365 or Azure, and don’t want to bring another vendor to the mix.

Key features

• Single sign-on across the Microsoft ecosystem: Users authenticate once and access Microsoft 365, Azure, and thousands of third-party apps without re-entering credentials.
• Conditional Access policies: Admins can define granular access rules based on user identity, device health, location, and real-time security risk signals. Policies can adapt to block or need step-up authentication when conditions change.
• Identity Protection (P2): Uses AI-driven risk analysis to detect compromised accounts and suspicious sign-ins. Entra can automatically trigger remediations like MFA challenges or access blocks.

Limitations

• Requires hands-on maintenance: Hybrid and on-prem deployments need regular patching and monitoring to keep everything running smoothly. Teams without that expertise may find the upkeep heavier than expected. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Uptime isn’t guaranteed: Service outages happen on occasion and can interrupt access when they do. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Not great outside Microsoft: Entra ID is purpose-built for Microsoft environments, so if you’re running a mixed environment, you’ll need to look for third-party connectors. [Read Full G2 Review]

Pricing

Entra ID has a cost-effective free tier included with Microsoft 365 subscriptions, plus three paid tiers.

• P1: $6 per user per month. Adds Conditional Access, hybrid identity support, and lifecycle management.
• P2: $9 per user per month. Includes everything in P1 plus Identity Protection and Privileged Identity Management.
• Entra Suite: $12 per user per month. Bundles P1 features with Governance, Internet Access, Private Access, and Verified ID.

11. JumpCloud

JumpCloud is another comprehensive solution that handles SSO, MFA, and cross-platform device management in a single console.

It replaces the need for on-prem Active Directory by acting as a centralized cloud directory that connects users to systems, applications, and networks regardless of operating system.

Key features

• Cloud directory with LDAP and RADIUS: Acts as a central identity store that supports legacy protocols out of the box. You can authenticate users across cloud apps, on-prem resources, WiFi, and VPNs from one directory.
• Cross-platform device management: Manages Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, and Android devices from a single console.
• MFA and conditional access: Enforces multi-factor authentication through JumpCloud Protect, with support for push notifications, TOTP, and hardware keys.

Limitations

• Pricing model isn’t intuitive: The combination of packages, tiers, and add-ons makes it difficult to understand what you’re paying for. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Poor experience on Apple’s devices: macOS and iOS IT management covers the basics, but lacks the depth of platforms built specifically for Apple environments. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Remote Assist is bare-bones: Screen sharing and file access are there, but the tool feels like an afterthought compared to more specialized remote support solutions. [Read Full G2 Review]

Pricing

JumpCloud offers a free tier for up to 10 users and 10 devices. Paid plans follow a modular, per-user pricing model. Device Management starts at $9 per user per month, SSO at $11, and the Core Directory Package at $13.

The full Platform bundle runs $15 per user per month, while Platform Plus with advanced features costs $18.

How to choose the right Zluri alternative

The right choice depends less on feature checklists and more on what problem is costing you time, money, or audit findings. A platform that’s perfect for one team might be overkill or underpowered for another.

Before you start comparing vendors, get clear on what’s driving the decision in the first place:

Once you’ve narrowed the field, you can pressure-test your shortlist with a few questions that some vendors don’t always answer upfront:

• How long does deployment actually take with a stack like ours? Push for a number, not a range.
• What’s included in the base price versus what costs extra? Connectors, premium support, and advanced workflows sometimes aren’t part of the initial quote.
• How much internal effort does the platform need once it’s live? Some tools need dedicated admins, while others run mostly on autopilot.
• Can we talk to a reference customer in our industry with a similar environment?

It’s also worth knowing what to watch out for. Be skeptical of demos that only show happy-path scenarios with perfectly clean data. Vague answers on implementation timelines or total cost of ownership are also a red flag, as is heavy reliance on professional services just to get basic workflows running.

Governance tools are multi-year commitments, and switching costs are high once you’re embedded. Spending an extra few weeks on evaluation beats spending the next three years working around a platform that never quite fits.

ConductorOne – The ideal Zluri alternative

The platforms in this guide cover a lot of ground, but most of them stop at discovery or basic lifecycle automation. When your auditors start asking about separation of duties, excessive permissions, or ungoverned service accounts, you need something built for governance from the start.

ConductorOne fits that gap. The platform handles automated access reviews, just-in-time provisioning, and non-human identity controls in a single console.

With ConductorOne, on top of the standard automated access reviews, you also get:

• 300+ pre-built connectors plus no-code options for custom and legacy systems
• AI agents that handle routine tasks and flag only the access decisions that need human judgment
• Just-in-time access that grants temporary permissions and revokes them automatically when the window closes
• A Unified Identity Graph that pulls access data from every system into a single, searchable view
• Non-human identity governance that finds and secures service accounts, secrets, and AI agents

If stale access, audit prep, or ungoverned service accounts are what pushed you to look for Zluri alternatives in the first place, ConductorOne is worth a closer look.

Book a demo and see how the platform handles it.