7 Best Zilla (now CyberArk IGA) Alternatives for 2026

Zilla Security built its reputation as a modern, cloud-native alternative to legacy IGA. In February 2025, CyberArk acquired the platform for $175 million, and Zilla’s core products (Zilla Comply and Zilla Provisioning) are now part of CyberArk’s identity security platform.

If you’re searching for Zilla Security competitors today, you’re looking at CyberArk IGA. The technology is largely the same, but the context has changed because Zilla now operates within a broader identity security suite, which may be a benefit or a drawback depending on your needs.

For organizations already in the CyberArk ecosystem, that’s a plus. For teams that want a focused, AI-native IGA tool that scales with your business, it’s worth seeing what else is out there.

This guide covers the main alternatives across the IGA spectrum: cloud-native alternatives, legacy players, and identity platforms with governance built in. For each one, we’ll cover what they do well, where they fall short according to user reviews, and what type of organization they’re best suited for.

Why look for an alternative to Zilla Security (now CyberArk IGA)?

The CyberArk acquisition doesn’t necessarily make Zilla a bad choice. But it does change who the product is best suited for. A few reasons you might want to explore alternatives:

• You’re looking for a focused governance tool: Zilla’s products are now part of CyberArk’s broader identity security suite. If you don’t want the weight of a larger platform, a focused IGA vendor might be a cleaner fit.
• You’re not already in the CyberArk ecosystem: CyberArk IGA fits naturally if you’re already using their PAM or identity products. If you’re starting from zero with CyberArk, a more focused vendor might mean less friction.
• You’re concerned about post-acquisition changes: Acquisitions tend to bring changes to things such as pricing, packaging, support structures, or roadmap priorities. If you want fewer unknowns, a vendor that hasn’t recently changed hands is a safer bet.
• Your environment is mostly cloud/SaaS with limited on-prem: CyberArk is built for complex, hybrid enterprise environments. If your stack is mostly SaaS and you don’t need that level of firepower, a lighter modern IGA tool might get you live faster.

There are also some CyberArk-specific friction points worth knowing about:

• UI/UX concerns: CyberArk’s interface can feel dated. If a modern, intuitive UX is important to your team’s adoption, some alternatives will feel more polished. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Upgrade stability: Some users report that CyberArk upgrades don’t always go smoothly, with updates occasionally breaking functionality. If you need a low-maintenance tool, that’s worth factoring in. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Documentation gaps: CyberArk’s product documentation has been a pain point for some admins because finding specific procedures can be harder than it should be. If self-service troubleshooting matters to your team, ask about this during evaluation. [Read Full G2 Review]

Key features and functionalities to look for in a Zilla Security alternative

Zilla’s strength has always been access reviews and compliance automation for digital identity governance. If you’re looking for a more complete IGA toolkit (or a different approach entirely), here’s what to prioritize:

• Developer-friendly tooling: If your org runs on infrastructure-as-code and API-first tooling, make sure your IGA fits that model. Zilla works fine for traditional IT workflows, but may feel clunky for engineering-led teams.
• Governance for non-human identities: Service accounts, API keys, and machine identities often outnumber humans in modern environments (and they’re increasingly targeted). Zilla was built for workforce identity governance. If you need controls over non-human identities, look for platforms that treat them as a first-class use case.
• Fast time-to-value: One of Zilla’s selling points was speed to value. As it integrates into CyberArk’s platform, it will be challenging to maintain agility. Prioritize vendors with a track record of fast, lightweight deployments.
• Self-service access requests with approvals: Employees shouldn’t need to file IT tickets to get access to the tools they need. Look for platforms with self-service portals, Slack or MS Teams integration, and configurable approval workflows. Zilla’s focus is more on the review side than the request side.
• A modern, intuitive interface: CyberArk’s UI has been called dated in user reviews. If adoption across managers, reviewers, and end users matters to you, prioritize platforms that invested in UX.
• Standalone simplicity: Zilla is now part of CyberArk’s broader identity security suite. That’s useful if you want IGA bundled with other security needs. But if you want a focused governance tool without the platform overhead, many alternatives are purpose-built for that.

7 alternatives to Zilla Security on the market today

Zilla is a capable platform for access reviews and compliance automation, especially for organizations already in the CyberArk ecosystem.

But if you need stronger just-in-time access controls, self-service request workflows, or governance for non-human identities, it may not check every box.

Here are eight alternatives worth evaluating:

1. ConductorOne
2. Veza Access Control Platform
3. SailPoint
4. Saviynt
5. Okta Identity Governance
6. Microsoft Entra ID Governance
7. One Identity Manager

1. ConductorOne

ConductorOne is an AI-native identity governance platform that automates access reviews, enforces least-privilege policies, and manages the full identity lifecycle across SaaS, infrastructure, and on-prem systems.

Unlike compliance-focused tools like Zilla Security, ConductorOne is built for security teams first. It provides real-time insights into every identity, automates remediation, and gives granular control across the environment. ConductorOne’s AI agents can provide recommendations and take care of routine access decisions, freeing up your team to focus on what matters.

Key features

• Intelligent access reviews: The platform automates review campaigns, flags risks, and recommends actions for each certification. Reviewers spend their time on the exceptions instead of clicking through thousands of routine approvals.
• Non-human identity governance: NHIs outnumber humans 20:1 in most environments, and they’re scattered everywhere. ConductorOne inventories service accounts, keys, tokens, certs, and AI agents, maps owners, and outlines risks in one place.
• Just-in-time access: Employees can request access in Slack, Teams, CLI, or the web app. Approval workflows route the request, and if approved, access gets provisioned automatically, and then expires on schedule.
• 300+ pre-built connectors: The platform integrates with SaaS and cloud and on-prem infrastructure, directories, databases, and more. For internal tools or legacy apps, custom connectors can be quickly configured with YAML.
• Identity lifecycle automation: Teams can automatically provision access for new hires, update permissions when roles change, and revoke everything when someone exits. Dynamic policies ensure users have exactly the access they need.
• Unified Identity Graph: You can visualize access relationships, find risks, and answer “who has access to what” without stitching together spreadsheets.

Why are companies choosing ConductorOne over Zilla Security?

• Focused governance without the platform bloat: Zilla Security is now part of CyberArk’s broader identity security suite. ConductorOne brings governance, lifecycle automation, and access control in a single focused platform, without pulling you into a larger ecosystem you may not need.
• Works with your existing identity stack: Zilla fits best if you’re already in or moving toward the CyberArk ecosystem. ConductorOne integrates with any IdP (Okta, Entra, Auth0, Google Workspace), so you get governance without committing to a new vendor’s full stack.
• Modern UX that teams will use: Zilla’s interface was functional, but CyberArk’s broader platform can feel dated and heavy. ConductorOne is built around a clean, intuitive experience with self-service access requests via Slack, Teams, web, or CLI. Admins and end users don’t need training to get started.
• Deploys in days: Zilla was known for relatively quick implementation, but post-acquisition complexity can change that. ConductorOne offers 300+ out-of-the-box connectors and a no-code setup that gets teams live fast.
• AI that handles the work, not just the reporting: Zilla offered AI-powered recommendations for access reviews. ConductorOne takes it further with AI agents that automate routine access decisions, handle provisioning and revocation, and close the loop on remediation.

What real customers are saying about ConductorOne

Instacart moved 100% of its privileged access to automated just-in-time provisioning with ConductorOne and eliminated quarterly access reviews entirely.

For edge cases that still needed human judgment, their team built an AI bot on top of ConductorOne’s API that now handles approvals across AWS, GCP, Snowflake, and internal systems without manual intervention.

That kind of automation scales even with a more complex IT infrastructure. DailyPay manages 100 AWS accounts, each with different approval needs. After deploying ConductorOne’s JIT access, they cut 300 monthly IT tickets and saved roughly 20 hours per month on access request processing.

And it works just as well when legacy systems are part of the picture. PriceSmart runs a 30-year-old JD Edwards environment alongside AWS and Azure across 13 countries. Before ConductorOne, quarterly access reviews took an entire quarter to complete. Now they finish in two to three weeks, and the manager review time dropped from hours to under 30 minutes.

2. Veza Access Control Platform

Veza is an identity security platform that maps authorization relationships across cloud infrastructure, SaaS applications, data systems, and on-prem environments.

Instead of stopping at “user X is in group Y,” Veza resolves the full chain to show what actions a given identity can take on which resources.

Just keep in mind that ServiceNow announced plans to acquire Veza in December 2025, so the roadmap and pricing will likely change.

Key features

• Access Graph for permission visibility: Veza’s graph-based infrastructure maps the full chain from identity to resource (users, groups, roles, policies, and effective permissions) across 300+ integrations.
• Lifecycle management with safeguards: The platform automates joiner-mover-leaver workflows with built-in protections like versioning, rollback controls, dry runs, and predictive limits.
• Data system access governance: Veza also governs access to databases, data lakes, and platforms like Snowflake, Oracle, and SharePoint. This makes it a fit for organizations where data-level permissions matter for compliance.

Limitations

• Custom integration scaling: Onboarding custom applications at scale could be smoother. If your environment includes a lot of non-standard systems, expect some overhead getting them integrated. [Read Full Gartner Review]
• Self-service customization is limited: If you want to tweak field names or hide certain elements, you’ll likely need to go through Veza’s team rather than doing it yourself. [Read Full Gartner Review]
• Learning curve and expertise requirements: Veza isn’t plug-and-play. Expect to invest time ramping up, and plan on having someone with a solid IAM background to run it effectively. [Read Full Gartner Review]

Pricing

Costs are quote-based and depend on the number of integrations and identities under management. The platform is available as a SaaS subscription, including through AWS Marketplace.

3. SailPoint

SailPoint is an enterprise-grade IGA platform with over a decade of experience in the market. It offers both cloud and on-prem deployment options, so it can be a good fit for organizations with hybrid environments and legacy systems.

Compared to Zilla, SailPoint goes deeper with identity lifecycle automation, AI-powered recommendations, separation of duties controls, and governance for non-human identities. If Zilla feels too narrow for your needs, SailPoint is at the opposite end of the spectrum.

Key features

• AI-driven access recommendations: SailPoint’s AI finds anomalies, suggests approvals or denials, and learns from your organization’s access patterns over time.
• Machine and non-human identity governance: SailPoint also governs service accounts, machine identities, and AI agents. If non-human identities are a blind spot in your current setup, this is a capability Zilla didn’t prioritize.
• Flexible deployment options: SailPoint offers both SaaS and on-prem options. For organizations with data residency concerns or legacy infrastructure that can’t move to the cloud, that flexibility is a differentiator.

Limitations

• Support responsiveness: Getting help when something breaks isn’t always fast. Users have noted that support tickets can linger, and resolving complex issues sometimes means paying for professional services. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Slow feature development cycle: SailPoint lets customers vote on feature requests, but doesn’t provide quick turnarounds. New features can take months or longer to make it into the product. [Read Full G2 Review]
• SaaS deployment overhead: Running custom cloud rules means going through SailPoint’s review process, which can slow down deployments and add unexpected costs. Something to factor in if you need heavy customization. [Read Full G2 Review]

Pricing

Like most enterprise IGA vendors, you’ll have to contact sales for a quote. That said, industry estimates put annual costs at roughly $75K for small implementations, $240K for mid-market, and $800K or more for large enterprises.

Learn more → 10 Best SailPoint Alternatives (Rated by User Reviews) - ConductorOne

4. Saviynt

Saviynt takes the opposite approach from Zilla. Instead of focusing narrowly on access reviews, it converges IGA, PAM, and application access governance into one platform.

You also get identity lifecycle automation, third-party identity management, JIT access, and fine-grained controls for business-critical apps like SAP and Workday.

The trade-off is weight. Saviynt is more complex to implement and manage than a focused access review tool.

Key features

• Just-in-time access: Saviynt introduced JIT capabilities in 2025 to reduce standing privileges at the application level. Users can request temporary, scoped access that’s automatically revoked when no longer needed.
• Application access governance for ERP systems: If you’re running SAP, Oracle, or Workday, Saviynt provides insights into application-level entitlements and separation of duties controls. This is deeper than what most IGA tools offer out of the box.
• Non-human identity management: Saviynt governs service accounts, machine identities, and AI agents alongside human users. This is especially important for organizations where non-human identities outnumber people.

Limitations

• Limited admin rollback options: When a task or workflow triggers incorrectly, reversing it isn’t straightforward. Admins have noted that rollback capabilities could be more accessible, which can slow down incident response. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Certification performance at scale: At scale, certification campaigns don’t always run smoothly. Users have reported performance hiccups when configuring reviews for 50,000+ identities. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Steep learning curve for end users: The platform handles complex data well, but that complexity bleeds into the user experience. Non-technical users often need more hand-holding to complete reviews and requests. [Read Full G2 Review]

Pricing

Saviynt uses a subscription-based SaaS model with pricing typically based on identity count or connected applications. There are no public pricing tiers, so you’ll need to talk with sales and get a custom quote.

5. Okta Identity Governance (OIG)

Okta Identity Governance (OIG) extends Okta’s Workforce Identity platform with access certifications, self-service access requests, and lifecycle automation.

It’s not a standalone IGA tool, so you’ll need an existing Okta deployment to use it. That makes it a natural fit for Okta-first environments, but a non-starter if you’re running a different IdP.

Key features

• No-code automation with Workflows: Okta Workflows lets you build custom provisioning, deprovisioning, and approval processes without writing code.
• Unified identity and governance platform: Because OIG sits on top of Okta’s single sign-on (SSO) and multi-factor authentication (MFA) infrastructure, you get a single pane of glass for authentication and governance.
• Self-service access requests with configurable approvals: Employees can browse available apps and roles, submit requests, and track status from the Okta dashboard.

Limitations

• Pricing and complexity for smaller teams: OIG’s pricing structure favors larger deployments. Smaller organizations may struggle with both the cost and the time investment needed to get advanced features working properly. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Integration complexity for certain apps: Not every integration works smoothly out of the box. Users have reported that connecting specific applications needed extensive coordination with third parties. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Occasional MFA latency: Push notifications for MFA can occasionally lag, which slows down login flows. It’s not a dealbreaker, but it can frustrate users who expect instant access. [Read Full G2 Review]

Pricing

OIG is sold as a subscription add-on to Okta Workforce Identity, so you’ll need an existing Okta deployment to use it.

There’s also a minimum annual contract of $1,500, but enterprise customers with 5,000+ users can negotiate volume discounts.

6. Microsoft Entra ID Governance

Microsoft Entra ID Governance is Microsoft’s identity governance add-on for Entra ID. It brings access certifications, entitlement management, and automated lifecycle workflows into the same platform you use for authentication.

The catch is that it’s built for Microsoft-heavy environments. Organizations already using Entra ID and Microsoft 365 get tight integration out of the box, while everyone else faces a steeper path to value.

Key features

• Lifecycle workflows for joiner-mover-leaver automation: You can define workflows that trigger before, during, or after key employee events (e.g., sending a temporary access pass to a new hire’s manager or disabling accounts when someone leaves).
• Entitlement management with access packages: Access packages bundle groups, applications, and SharePoint sites into a single unit. Employees or external collaborators can request access through a self-service portal.
• Separation of duties enforcement: Released in GA preview in 2025, SoD policies let you define incompatible role combinations and block or flag access requests that would create conflicts.

Limitations

• Limited granular reporting: Reporting gets the job done at a high level, but finer-grained views aren’t always available out of the box. Teams that need detailed access analytics may hit limitations. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Security key rotation overhead: Managing cybersecurity key rotation is manageable for smaller deployments, but the overhead grows quickly. Large organizations may find themselves assigning someone to handle key lifecycle management full-time. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Complex setup and high cost: Expect a steep setup process and a price tag to match. Smaller teams or those new to Microsoft’s identity stack may find the combination of complexity and cost harder to justify. [Read Full G2 Review]

Pricing

Microsoft Entra ID Governance is sold as an add-on to Entra ID P1 or P2, priced at around $7 per user per month. Organizations on Microsoft 365 E3 or E5 may already have Entra ID P1 or P2 included, but the governance add-on is separate.

7. One Identity Manager

One Identity Manager is a full-stack IGA platform built for enterprises with complicated identity sprawl. It governs access across on-prem, cloud-based, and hybrid environments, with certified SAP connectors, deep role modeling, and lifecycle automation included.

Where Zilla stayed focused on access reviews for cloud applications, One Identity Manager goes broader and deeper. That reach comes at a cost of longer deployments and more configuration work upfront.

Key features

• Certified SAP integration: The platform provides deep, certified connectors for SAP environments. Teams can manage SAP roles, enforce SoD policies, and run access certifications within your existing SAP cloud security model.
• Behavior-driven governance: The platform analyzes how users are accessing their entitlements to identify accounts with excessive or unused privileges.
• Attestation and certification campaigns: Administrators can run granular certification campaigns based on changes to users, roles, or entitlements. Reviewers see historical context to make faster, more informed decisions.

Limitations

• Dashboard and log reporting: Dashboard reporting is functional but not particularly refined. If your team needs detailed log analysis at a glance, expect to do some extra work outside the platform. [Read Full G2 Review]
• UI complexity for beginners: The platform is powerful, but the interface doesn’t make it easy to get started. Beginners often struggle with navigation until they’ve logged enough hours to learn the layout. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Documentation gaps and portal customization: Product documentation has gaps, especially for less common modules. And if you need to customize the web portal, be prepared for a steeper process than the core features suggest. [Read Full G2 Review]

Pricing

One Identity Manager uses quote-based pricing, typically licensed per user. There’s no public pricing, and costs depend on user count, modules, and deployment complexity.

Implementation can run anywhere from $5,000 to $50,000+ depending on customization and integration needs.

How to choose the right Zilla Security alternative

There’s no single “best” alternative. The right methodology starts with your specific environment, team, and priorities.

The tools on this list serve different use cases, from lean access reviews to full-scale enterprise governance.

Here’s how to think through the decision:

Define your primary goal

Not every organization needs the same thing from IGA. Some are trying to pass their next SOC 2 audit with cleaner access reviews, while others need to automate onboarding across dozens of systems.

The tools on this list serve different use cases, and the right one depends on where your pain is sharpest. Here’s a breakdown of common goals and the types of platforms built to handle them.

Match the tool to the problem. If you need cleaner access reviews for a SaaS-heavy environment, a lightweight platform will get you there faster and cheaper.

On the other hand, if you’re governing identities across legacy ERP systems, AD forests, and multiple cloud providers, you’ll need something with more depth.

Distinguish governance from IT operations

Vendor messaging often treats governance and IT operations as interchangeable. They’re not. And buying a tool optimized for one when you need the other is a common mistake.

Governance is about proving access is appropriate. It answers questions like:

• Who has access to what?
• Why do they have it?
• Should they still have it?
• Is their level of access appropriate for their role?

The work shows up as access certifications, audit trails, SoD policies, and compliance reporting. It’s mainly about demonstrating control to auditors and regulators.

IT operations is about getting people access quickly and efficiently. It covers provisioning, onboarding workflows, self-service requests, and anything else that keeps IT from drowning in tickets. The goal is speed, automation, and less manual work.

Tools tend to favor one side or the other. Access review platforms are often strong on certifications but weak on provisioning. IT-focused tools automate onboarding well but may not satisfy auditors. Larger IGA suites try to do everything, though the tradeoff is usually complexity and a heavier lift to deploy.

Define where the pressure is coming from before you start comparing platforms. Compliance and audit gaps point toward governance-heavy tools, while overloaded IT teams and slow provisioning point toward operational automation.

Prioritize automation and remediation

Manual processes don’t scale. If every access review, approval, and revocation requires someone to click through a queue or file a ticket, you’re building in delays and bottlenecks that only get worse as your environment grows.

Look for platforms that automate the repetitive work:

• Scheduling and running certification campaigns without manual setup each cycle
• Routing approvals based on policy, role, or risk level
• Revoking access automatically when reviews aren’t completed or attestations fail
• Triggering workflows or tickets when issues are detected

An IGA platform that finds problems but can’t fix them only gets you halfway.

Over-permissioned accounts and orphaned access don’t resolve themselves, and manual follow-up takes time. Platforms that automate remediation close the loop faster and reduce how long you’re sitting on known risk.

ConductorOne – The ideal Zilla Security alternative

ConductorOne gives security and IT teams a modern, focused alternative to Zilla Security and CyberArk IGA. Instead of buying into a sprawling platform built for complex enterprise environments, you get AI-powered governance, lifecycle automation, and access control in one system that deploys fast and works with your existing identity stack.

Here are just some of the things you get with ConductorOne:

• Just-in-time access that provisions and revokes automatically based on policy
• Intelligent access reviews that find risks and recommend actions for reviewers
• Non-human identity governance for service accounts, API keys, tokens, and AI agents
• 300+ pre-built connectors for SaaS, cloud infrastructure, on-prem systems, and custom apps
• Identity lifecycle automation that keeps permissions aligned with role changes from day one to offboarding
• A Unified Identity Graph that answers “who has access to what” without the tedious spreadsheets

ConductorOne gives you governance that works the way modern security teams operate – fast deployment, flexible integrations, and AI that handles the repetitive work. No multi-year implementation and no platform bloat.

Book a demo to see how it fits your stack.