9 Top-Rated Veza Alternatives & Competitors (2026 Update)

Veza recently made headlines after it was announced that ServiceNow intended to acquire the platform in late 2025. As with most mergers and acquisitions, it will likely take ServiceNow considerable time to define product strategy, rebuild the roadmap, integrate teams, resolve customer overlap, and determine how identity fits into their broader portfolio. This will mean any product roadmap or improvements will be significantly delayed.

Acquisitions often introduce roadblocks for existing customers: slower support, shifting priorities, and eventual product migration requirements. It’s rare for a security product to get better after an acquisition.

Veza is often listed on most identity security roundups because of their Access Graph feature, which maps permissions at a level of detail that legacy IGA tools never attempted (down to specific data objects, tables, and resources).

For teams managing hundreds of SaaS apps and thousands of non-human identities, that depth of detail is the whole point. But visibility isn’t governance. Until recently, Veza did not offer end-to-end governance, automation, or provisioning—all necessary pieces of modern, AI-native identity governance.

Then there’s the maturity factor. Organizations with complex legacy environments or deep provisioning requirements may want vendors with longer track records in those specific workflows.

For this guide, we analyzed user reviews, product documentation, and community discussions to find alternatives to Veza worth considering. Here’s how they stack up.

Why look for an alternative to Veza?

Veza doesn’t have the G2 review volume or Reddit threads that older IGA platforms do. That said, the reasons teams explore alternatives tend to fall into predictable categories based on who Veza is built for.

Here’s where the fit tends to break down:

• Enterprise pricing for enterprise buyers: Veza’s customer list (Blackstone, Snowflake, Workday, etc.) makes the target market clear. Mid-market teams might find that Veza’s cost structure is built for larger budgets than theirs.
• Younger remediation and provisioning features: The Access Graph is Veza’s foundation. Provisioning, just-in-time (JIT) access, and remediation came significantly later as the platform expanded. Organizations with heavy lifecycle management needs might prefer platforms where those workflows have more years behind them.
• Built for cloud-native environments: Veza could be a great fit when you’re managing SaaS apps, cloud infrastructure like AWS and Google Cloud, and non-human identities. Heavy on-prem or legacy IAM environments may need more specialized support.
• Depth you might not need: The Access Graph is powerful, but not every organization needs permission mapping down to the table level. Simpler environments may find Veza’s granularity more complex and overly tactical.
• Still building credibility in compliance-heavy sectors: Veza now serves finance, healthcare, and government clients. But organizations in those verticals often prefer vendors with a stronger compliance track record.

Key features and functionalities to look for in a Veza alternative

What you need from an alternative depends on why Veza isn’t the right fit. Here are some of the features worth weighing:

• Time-to-value: Enterprise IGA deployments can stretch for quarters. Modern platforms with prebuilt connectors and API-first architecture can get you live in weeks, or sometimes even days.
• Just-in-time access: Veza added JIT access in late 2024. If zero standing privilege is central to your security model, consider platforms where time-bound access has been a foundational feature, not a newer expansion.
• Automated access reviews: Manual reviews don’t scale and often get rubber-stamped. Look for platforms that automate the full review cycle – delegation, reminders, bulk actions, and audit-ready reporting.
• Self-service access requests: Veza introduced self-service access requests recently. If frictionless, employee-facing workflows are a priority, look for platforms where self-service has been refined over years of iteration.
• No-code automation: Veza’s Access Graph is powerful but technical. If your team lacks dedicated IGA specialists, prioritize platforms with intuitive, no-code workflow builders that don’t need scripting or custom development.

Top alternatives to Veza on the market right now

Veza works well for large enterprises that need granular permission visibility across complex cloud environments. The Access Graph brings insight that legacy IGA tools simply can’t match.

But for mid-market teams, organizations with simpler access structures, or those who need battle-tested provisioning workflows, the fit isn’t always there.

These are the top 9 Veza competitors worth evaluating for 2026:

1. ConductorOne
2. Saviynt
3. SailPoint
4. Okta Identity Governance
5. Microsoft Entra ID Governance
6. One Identity Manager
7. CyberArk
8. Omada Identity
9. IBM Security Verify Governance

1. ConductorOne

ConductorOne is a modern, AI-native identity governance platform that gives security and IT teams centralized visibility and control over human, non-human, and AI identities.

The platform takes a security-first approach. Where Veza focuses mainly on visibility, ConductorOne leans into automation. A powerful policy engine and customizable AI agents manage access requests, reviews, and policy enforcement so teams can apply least privilege without having to hire more people.

Deployment is fast. Most organizations go live in just days or weeks, and 300+ prebuilt connectors with no-code setup let security teams start closing access gaps and vulnerabilities right away.

Key features

• Just-in-time access to remove standing privileges: Users ask for time-bound access through Slack, MS Teams, web, or CLI. Low-risk requests can be configured to auto-approve, sensitive access can be routed through multistep workflows, and everything revokes automatically when it expires.
• Automated access reviews and audit-ready reporting: ConductorOne automates user access review campaigns with customizable policies, Slack and MS Teams notifications, auto-certifications, and zero-touch deprovisioning. One-click reports make SOX, SOC 2, and ISO 27001 audits much easier.
• Non-human identity governance: The platform finds service accounts, API keys, tokens, certificates, and AI agents across your environment. ConductorOne maps these identities to responsible owners and alerts on risks like vulnerable service accounts.
• Fast deployment with 300+ prebuilt connectors: Most companies can go live in days or weeks. Prebuilt connectors cover cloud infrastructure, SaaS, directories, on-prem systems, and homegrown apps, with no-code options for anything custom.
• Unified Identity Graph for complete access insight: ConductorOne connects identity, permission, and resource data from all your systems into a single view. Security teams can visualize access paths and remediate issues like orphaned accounts or unused privileges with a click.
• AI agents that automate access operations: ConductorOne’s AI agents can be tasked to handle access request approvals, reviews, and policy enforcement without human intervention. Teams can deploy multiple agents with different rules for different departments or applications.

Why are companies choosing ConductorOne over Veza?

• Faster time-to-value: Veza implementations can take a lot of time and resources to get right, especially for more complex environments. ConductorOne deploys in days or weeks with 300+ prebuilt connectors, so security teams start reducing risk right away.
• Broader out-of-box coverage: Veza’s integration library is growing but still needs custom work for many applications. ConductorOne connects to cloud infrastructure, SaaS, on-prem systems, directories, and legacy apps out of the box, with no-code options for anything that isn’t already supported.
• Lower barrier to entry: Veza’s query language and technical depth can overwhelm teams without heavy engineering resources. ConductorOne is built for security and IT practitioners as well as end users, with an intuitive interface that works without specialized training.
• Action over observation: Mapping permissions is valuable, but Veza leaves much of the remediation to manual effort. ConductorOne automates the follow-through, from access requests to reviews to policy enforcement.

What real customers are saying about ConductorOne

ConductorOne integrates with your existing identity provider. For example, Zscaler added it on top of Okta and watched new hire provisioning shrink from weeks to 10 minutes, while provisioning-related help desk tickets dropped by 60%.

DigitalOcean struggled with compliance pain points. Spreadsheet-based access reviews couldn’t keep pace with SOC 2 and SOX requirements. ConductorOne brought them to 100% on-time review completion and reduced the effort involved by 85%.

System1 had even less runway to work with since SOX requirements hit right after going public, and visibility was fragmented across systems from past acquisitions. They deployed ConductorOne in three weeks and compressed quarterly audit prep from several weeks to a single day.

2. Saviynt

Saviynt is an enterprise identity and access management platform that bundles IGA, PAM, and cloud entitlement management into a single system.

The platform targets large companies that deal with compliance complexity across hybrid and multi-cloud environments.

Saviynt takes a different approach than Veza. Instead of deep permission mapping, it mainly focuses on bringing IGA, PAM, and secure access governance under one roof.

Key features

• Application access governance with SoD access controls: The platform applies segregation of duties across enterprise apps like SAP, Oracle, and Workday. This is particularly useful for organizations facing SOX or GDPR audits.
• Converged identity platform: Companies that would otherwise juggle multiple point solutions can manage workforce, external, and machine identities from a single interface.

Limitations

• The interface can overwhelm new users: It’s not the most intuitive platform to pick up. The breadth of features comes with interface complexity, and users report a longer ramp-up period compared to more streamlined tools. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Ticket resolution can take longer than expected: Support experiences are inconsistent. When issues come up, getting to the root cause can take multiple calls and extended ticket cycles. [Read Full G2 Review]
• New features get more love than core functionality: The company is investing heavily in AI capabilities. However, a few users feel the foundational product could use the same level of attention. [Read Full G2 Review]

Pricing

The platform uses a tiered model that suits different maturity levels:

• Essentials includes foundational identity security needs.
• Pro removes caps on applications and identities for broader enterprise rollouts.
• Premier brings comprehensive coverage and cross-platform identity insights for compliance-heavy industries.

All native connectors come standard, and costs scale with your identity footprint.

3. SailPoint

SailPoint identity security cloud is an enterprise IGA platform with decades of market presence behind it. The platform handles workforce, non-employee, and machine identities with automation and extensive out-of-the-box connectivity.

Compared to Veza’s visibility-first approach, SailPoint is more focused on lifecycle management and access governance at scale.

Key features

• Extensive connector library: The platform connects to thousands of applications out of the box, including deep integrations with SAP, Salesforce, and major cloud security platforms.
• Non-employee risk management: The platform governs contractors, vendors, and third-party identities with the same rigor as employees.
• Machine identity security: SailPoint can also govern service accounts, bots, and other non-human identities. The platform can classify and assign ownership to machine accounts at enterprise scale.

Limitations

• Limited localization and time zone flexibility: Configuration options for regional needs are limited. Organizations with distributed teams may find time zone handling and localization less flexible than expected. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Roadmap delays: Roadmap delivery isn’t always fast. Teams waiting on specific features may find themselves stuck until updates eventually roll out. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Customization can create technical debt: Heavy customization comes with trade-offs. Organizations that tailor the platform too aggressively often face harder upgrades and long-term maintenance problems. [Read Full G2 Review]

Pricing

Pricing isn’t published on SailPoint’s site, so you’ll have to ask for a custom quote.

Some industry estimates put yearly costs at roughly $75,000 for small-scale implementations, $240,000 for mid-market companies, and $800,000 or more at the enterprise level.

Learn more → 10 Best SailPoint Alternatives (Rated by User Reviews) - ConductorOne

4. Okta Identity Governance (OIG)

Okta Identity Governance extends Okta’s Workforce Identity Cloud with access governance, lifecycle management, and workflow automation.

For teams already running Okta for SSO and MFA, OIG brings governance without introducing another vendor or integration project.

That said, OIG is built to govern access within Okta’s ecosystem rather than provide visibility across your entire stack. Where Veza maps permissions at the data and resource level across hundreds of systems, Okta’s approach stays closer to the authentication layer.

Key features

• Unified identity and governance platform: OIG works inside Okta’s Workforce Identity Cloud alongside SSO, MFA, and directory services. Teams already on Okta can add governance without managing a separate vendor relationship
• Hundreds of prebuilt integrations: Okta’s connector library covers most enterprise SaaS apps out of the box, which reduces the custom integration work typical of legacy IGA platforms.
• No-code workflows for automation: Okta Workflows lets teams build custom identity processes (onboarding sequences, access request routing, and license reclamation) without writing code.

Limitations

• Integration quality varies across apps: Okta connects to thousands of applications, but not all integrations are equally polished. Some connectors work seamlessly out of the box, while others need manual setup or ongoing attention to keep provisioning in sync. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Steep learning curve for administrators: OIG offers extensive configuration options, but that flexibility comes with complexity. Admins without prior Okta experience often face a steep ramp-up period. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Pricing can stretch smaller budgets: Cost can be a barrier. Okta is built for enterprise buyers, and smaller organizations may find the pricing steep relative to their needs. [Read Full G2 Review]

Pricing

Okta prices its “Essentials Suite” at $17 per user per month on an annual contract. You get identity governance bundled with access governance, lifecycle management, and 50 workflows.

There’s no standalone Identity Governance option, which means you’ll need to purchase a suite with a minimum annual spend of $1,500.

5. Microsoft Entra ID Governance

Microsoft Entra ID Governance is the IGA layer of Microsoft’s Entra platform, and it handles identity lifecycle management, access reviews, and entitlement management for companies already invested in Microsoft 365 or Azure.

The main pitch is native integration. If you’re a Microsoft shop, Entra ID Governance fits naturally into your existing stack.

Key features

• Privileged identity management for just-in-time access: PIM provides time-bound, approval-based activation for administrative roles across Microsoft Entra, Azure, and Microsoft 365.
• Entitlement management with self-service access packages: Teams can bundle applications, groups, and resources into access packages that users acquire through a self-service portal.
• Lifecycle workflows for joiner/leaver automation: Entra ID Governance automates common identity lifecycle tasks like onboarding new employees and deprovisioning accounts when people leave. This also streamlines user management across the entire identity lifecycle.

Limitations

• Setup and licensing complexity: Implementation isn’t plug-and-play. Between the setup process and the nuances of Microsoft’s licensing model, teams often need more time than expected to get things running smoothly. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Interface can be hard to navigate: Navigation takes getting used to. The terminology is Microsoft-specific, and admins who aren’t already fluent in Azure may struggle to locate what they need. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Non-Microsoft environments are harder to govern: The platform is optimized for Microsoft 365 and Azure, so teams with different SaaS stacks may hit integration friction. [Read Full G2 Review]

Pricing

Microsoft offers Entra ID Governance through three subscription tiers:

• P1 at $6/user/month covers both enterprise and SMB use cases.
• P2 at $9/user/month adds Microsoft 365 E5 integration for enterprise environments.
• Entra Suite at $12/user/month combines governance with network access, identity protection, and advanced cybersecurity capabilities.

6. One Identity Manager

One Identity Manager provides identity governance and administration for enterprises that manage complex hybrid environments.

The sweet spot is organizations with legacy infrastructure that they can’t abandon. If you’re running heavy Active Directory or SAP environments alongside modern cloud-based apps, One Identity Manager is built for that mix.

Key features

• Granular attestation campaigns: The platform supports attestation workflows that focus on specific changes to users, roles, or assignments rather than blanket reviews.
• Unified governance for hybrid environments: One Identity Manager handles provisioning and governance across on-premises systems, cloud service apps, and SaaS platforms from a single console.
• Self-service access requests with shopping cart: End users can ask for entitlements and group memberships through a self-service portal with a shopping-cart interface.

Limitations

• Interface takes time to learn: The UI isn’t intuitive out of the gate. New users often find the interface complicated at first, though it becomes more manageable with experience. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Documentation gaps for some modules: Not all modules are equally well-documented. Teams implementing less common features may find themselves reaching out to support more than expected. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Setup isn’t beginner-friendly: The setup process assumes familiarity. Organizations new to the platform often find it hard to get oriented without hands-on guidance or training. [Read Full G2 Review]

Pricing

Pricing for One Identity Manager follows a per-user annual model with tiers that scale according to company size. You’ll need to contact them directly for specific numbers.

7. CyberArk

CyberArk is one of the major players in the privileged access management market, and it’s now expanding into identity governance following its February 2025 acquisition of Zilla Security.

It’s a different angle than Veza’s visibility-centric approach because CyberArk starts with high-risk access and then works outward.

Key features

• AI-driven role management and access reviews: The Zilla-powered IGA tools use AI to automate role creation and entitlement recommendations.
• Privileged access management solution at the core: CyberArk’s PAM capabilities include credential vaulting, session recording, just-in-time access, and zero standing privileges. This visibility supports stronger security posture management across every endpoint.
• Rapid IGA deployment: CyberArk claims that Zilla’s modern IGA deploys five times faster than legacy systems and reduces provisioning tickets by 60%.

Limitations

• Upgrades can be disruptive: Platform stability during upgrades is a concern. Teams should plan for additional testing and troubleshooting when rolling out new versions. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Documentation can be hard to navigate: Finding what you need in the docs takes work. Administrators have noted that locating specific procedures isn’t always straightforward, especially for less common tasks. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Support responsiveness varies: Enterprise support could be more responsive. Some customers feel that account teams and support escalation paths don’t move quickly enough when urgent issues come up. [Read Full G2 Review]

Pricing

CyberArk operates on a quote-only basis with no public pricing. Their subscription model factors in user counts and selected features, and costs can swing considerably depending on how you deploy and what your environment looks like.

8. Omada Identity

Omada Identity is a veteran IGA vendor (founded in 2000) that offers a cloud-native platform for identity lifecycle management, access governance, and compliance.

What sets Omada apart is the process-first methodology. The built-in IdentityPROCESS+ framework provides a structured path through IGA implementation and ongoing IT operations, and the company backs that up with a guaranteed 12-week deployment.

Key features

• Guaranteed 12-week deployment: The accelerator package promises full IGA functionality in 12 weeks at a fixed cost. Omada achieves this through a structured five-step process and pre-built configurations.
• AI-powered role insights and identity analytics: Omada applies ML to role mining and entitlement analysis, so teams can build cleaner role structures without starting from scratch.
• Code-free configuration: Teams can customize workflows, approval chains, and integrations without writing code. This reduces reliance on specialized developers and makes ongoing maintenance more manageable.

Limitations

• Navigation can be confusing: Navigation isn’t always obvious. Users have noted that certain features are tucked under labels that don’t clearly describe what they do. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Initial setup can be slow and resource-intensive: Expect a heavier lift upfront. The setup process is more involved than some alternatives, and performance can lag during early stages. [Read Full G2 Review]
• The interface looks dated: The UI feels behind the times. The platform delivers strong functionality and data security solutions, but the design looks older compared to more modern IGA tools. [Read Full G2 Review]

Pricing

Pricing follows an annual per-user model that adjusts based on how large your deployment is and which features you need.

Omada keeps specific rates private, so you’ll have to go through a sales call to get a custom quote.

9. IBM Security Verify Governance

IBM Security Verify Governance is another popular enterprise-grade IGA platform that manages identity lifecycles, access certifications, and compliance workflows across on-prem, cloud, and hybrid deployments.

The key differentiator is how IBM handles separation of duties. Instead of role-to-role comparisons, Verify Governance models risk around business activities like purchase order creation or payment approvals.

Key features

• Business-activity-based SoD controls: Rather than comparing roles to roles, IBM maps separation of duties risks to business activities. This makes SoD policies easier to maintain and gives compliance teams a clearer view of what access combinations create business risk.
• Automated lifecycle management: Verify Governance automates joiner, mover, and leaver processes with flexible provisioning policies.
• Integration with PAM and data access governance: Verify Governance connects to IBM’s privileged access management and data governance tools and templates.

Limitations

• Third-party integrations can slow things down: Not all integrations are plug-and-play. Some third-party apps need detailed configuration work, and limited documentation can make the process slower than anticipated. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Licensing costs run higher than some alternatives: The platform isn’t cheap. Licensing costs are higher than some alternatives, so teams should factor that into their total cost of ownership calculations. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Initial setup takes time to get right: Setup isn’t straightforward. The platform is powerful, but first-time configuration can feel overwhelming for teams new to enterprise-scale identity governance. [Read Full G2 Review]

Pricing

IBM Security Verify uses a resource unit (RU) model based on real-time consumption rather than flat per-user fees. You purchase RUs on an annual basis, with costs based on your user count, feature usage, and login frequency.

For a 5,000-user deployment, ballpark figures come to roughly $1.81/user/month for single sign-on (SSO), $1.81 for multi-factor authentication (MFA), and $2.13 for lifecycle management.

ConductorOne – The Ideal Alternative to Veza

Veza is a capable platform for understanding access, but knowing who has access to what is only half the battle.

ConductorOne takes the next step with AI-powered automation that lets security teams act on access risks immediately. The payoff is faster results, less manual effort, and steady progress toward least privilege.

What you get with ConductorOne:

• AI-native automation that simplifies access requests, reviews, and policy enforcement without manual intervention
• Just-in-time access that replaces standing privileges with time-bound, auto-revoking permissions
• Automated access reviews with one-click, audit-ready reports for SOX, SOC 2, and ISO 27001
• Non-human identity governance that discovers and secures service accounts, API keys, and AI agents
• 300+ prebuilt connectors that get teams live in days
• A Unified Identity Graph that connects access data across every system into one view

Legacy IGA made identity governance slow and painful. ConductorOne makes it fast, automated, and security-first.

Book a demo to see the difference for yourself.