11 Best Saviynt Alternatives for 2026 (According to User Reviews)

Saviynt appears on most IGA platform shortlists for good reason. If you’re running a large enterprise with thousands of identities and complex governance needs, it’s built to handle exactly that scale.

But legacy enterprise-grade platforms carry enterprise-level complexity, and that trade-off doesn’t work for everyone. Established IGA platforms like Saviynt typically come with multi-month implementations, professional services support, and total costs that exceed the platform licensing.

With the identity landscape becoming increasingly complex, the market is shifting. Both Fortune 500 enterprises and startups are turning to modern IGA solutions like ConductorOne that can handle scale without the complicated processes tied to legacy tools.

Modern platforms completely changed what’s possible. Teams can now deploy in weeks, integrate without custom development, and manage identity governance without becoming platform specialists.

For this guide, we sourced hundreds of reviews on G2 and Capterra, looked at product features and documentation, and browsed Reddit discussions where teams talk honestly about their IGA platforms. We found 11 common alternatives that come up when users want a solid IGA without the enterprise overhead.

Why look for an alternative to Saviynt?

Saviynt handles enterprise-scale identity governance well, but no platform is perfect. These pain points come up frequently enough in G2 reviews that they’re worth considering before you commit to an implementation:

• Few pre-built connectors out of the box: Saviynt doesn’t come with many ready-to-use integrations, so teams end up building custom connectors for applications that should already be supported. What users expect to be plug-and-play turns into development work. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Steep learning curve for new users: The interface feels complex and unintuitive, especially for team members who haven’t worked with enterprise IGA platforms before. Advanced configurations need technical expertise, which slows down implementation for teams without identity specialists. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Support teams struggle with root cause analysis: When issues come up, users report that support agents often can’t diagnose the actual problem. Tickets drag on with multiple meetings that rehash information already provided, and resolutions take far longer than they should. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Account management vulnerabilities during transitions: Users experience problems with duplicate accounts, particularly when employees transfer between departments or roles and their IDs change. The platform doesn’t always handle these identity transitions cleanly, which creates cleanup work for IT teams. [Read Full G2 Review]

Key features and functionalities to consider in a Saviynt alternative

Not every IGA platform approaches identity governance the same way. The features that matter most depend on your organization’s size, technical resources, and how you need the platform to fit into your existing infrastructure.

Here are some of the core capabilities to pay attention to as you compare alternatives:

Pre-built connectors and integrations

The connector library matters more than most teams realize until they’re midway through implementation. Saviynt requires custom development for many common applications, which slows down rollout and ties up technical resources.

A strong alternative should offer pre-built integrations for the apps your team uses daily. The platforms that get this right let you connect to major SaaS tools, directories, and cloud infrastructure without custom code.

Implementation speed and time-to-value

Traditional IGA platforms like Saviynt can take six months or longer to implement, which delays the security and compliance benefits you bought the platform for in the first place.

Modern alternatives bring faster deployments through better defaults, cleaner interfaces, and less need for custom configuration. When you evaluate platforms, ask about typical implementation timelines and what factors might extend them.

The difference between a two-month rollout and a six-month project affects not just your timeline but also team morale and organizational buy-in.

Intuitive user interface and admin experience

A complex interface might seem like a minor issue until your team spends weeks just learning how to complete routine tasks. End user adoption is smoother and use is higher when UX is strong.

Modern alternatives approach UI with clean dashboards, logical workflows, and self-explanatory options that reduce training time.

When you evaluate platforms, have team members test the interface to see if it makes sense to people who’ll use it daily.

Flexibility without custom development

Users often find themselves stuck between two bad options – accept workflows that don’t match their processes, or invest in custom development to make the platform fit their needs.

Modern IGA platforms handle this better through flexible configuration options that don’t need coding. The best alternatives let you adapt workflows, customize approval chains, and modify policies without writing code or hiring consultants.

Top alternatives to Saviynt on the market right now

Legacy enterprise platforms no longer define the IGA category. Today’s alternatives range from modern, AI-native platforms to specialized governance tools from your existing identity provider.

These are the Saviynt alternatives that come up most in user reviews and implementation discussions:

1. ConductorOne
2. Okta Identity Governance
3. Microsoft Entra ID
4. Oracle Identity Governance
5. SailPoint
6. CyberArk
7. IBM Security Verify
8. Omada Identity
9. One Identity Manager
10. RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle
11. Lumos

1. ConductorOne

ConductorOne is an AI-native modern identity governance platform that automates secure access management for both human and non-human identities across cloud, on-premises, and homegrown systems.

Where traditional IGA platforms like Saviynt need professional services teams and months of customization work, ConductorOne takes a different approach with pre-built connectors and no-code workflows that get you up and running fast.

The platform was purpose-built for Security and IT teams who want enterprise-grade governance without the enterprise complexity. Teams get an intuitive interface they can configure themselves, plus modern tooling like Terraform and webhooks that make it simple to extend governance across the entire tech stack.

Key solutions

• Just-in-time access with automatic expiration: Employees request temporary application access through a self-service portal or directly from Slack, MS Teams, or CLI, and the platform grants time-limited permissions that expire automatically when the period ends.
• 300+ pre-built connectors with lightweight integration: ConductorOne connects to cloud applications, on-premises systems, directories, HR platforms, and homegrown tools through both out-of-the-box and easy-to-configure custom connectors that deploy quickly without heavy integration work.
• Unified Identity Graph for comprehensive visibility: ConductorOne pulls access and permissions data from every system in your environment into one central view, where you can see who has access to what and why they have it.
• Full identity lifecycle automation: The platform automates joiner-mover-leaver workflows by syncing with HR systems to provision access on day one, adjust permissions during role changes, and deprovision everything when employees leave.
• Non-human identity governance and risk management: The platform finds, catalogs, and maps relationships for service accounts, API keys, OAuth tokens, certificates, and AI agents across your systems.
• AI-powered access reviews: ConductorOne policies can be configured to show reviewers only new or modified access since the last certification, and AI-driven insights flag permissions with elevated security risk.
• AI agents: ConductorOne’s native agents can be configured to handle helpdesk inquiries and routine tasks like access request and review routing and analysis. They have a deep understanding of policies and context and can provide recommendations to human approvers and even approve or deny access autonomously.

Why do companies choose ConductorOne over Saviynt?

• Faster deployment without professional services: ConductorOne deploys in weeks with an average implementation time of 30 days, while traditional IGA platforms often need months of professional services work. [*]
• Intuitive user experience for admins and end users: ConductorOne offers a modern interface designed for ease of use without extensive training. While Saviynt has made UI improvements, many users still find the interface less intuitive for both administrators and employees. [*]
• Support for modern developer tools and workflows: The platform includes native support for Terraform, webhooks, open APIs, and SDK integration so teams can automate and extend functionality easily. Saviynt currently lacks support for these modern development tools, which can complicate customization efforts. [*]
• Strong customer support experience: The platform offers responsive support teams that work directly with customers to troubleshoot and resolve issues. In contrast, some Saviynt customers have noted that support interactions can take longer to reach resolution. [*]

What real customers are saying about ConductorOne

Companies across different industries have seen major improvements in both speed and security after switching to ConductorOne.

For example, Zscaler cut new-hire onboarding from weeks to 10 minutes with automated provisioning, while their help desk tickets dropped by 60% because the platform handled routine access requests automatically.

At Brex, the problem was maintaining compliance in a regulated industry while keeping teams productive. The fintech company automated 50,000 access requests with ConductorOne and moved to just-in-time provisioning, which lowered operating expenses and kept full audit trails intact.

For DigitalOcean, the pain point was quarterly access reviews — the kind of tedious, spreadsheet-based process that drags on and still barely makes the deadline.

After implementing ConductorOne, they hit 100% on-time completion for both SOC2 and SOX certifications, and the team spent 85% less time on the process.

2. Okta Identity Governance

Okta Identity Governance is a cloud-based identity and access management solution that combines lifecycle management, access governance, and workflow automation into a unified system.

The platform uses Okta’s 600+ pre-built integrations to manage user access across applications, enforce least-privilege policies, and automate compliance reviews. If you already use Okta for authentication, you can add governance to your existing setup without buying a new tool.

Key features

• Extensive pre-built connector library: The platform includes more than 600 native integrations with popular SaaS applications, cloud platforms, and on-premises systems.
• Automated access certifications with context: Access reviews include contextual information like sign-in frequency and last access dates, so reviewers can make informed decisions about who should keep access.
• No-code workflow automation: You can automate identity processes without writing code, from custom approval chains to complex provisioning tasks.

Limitations

• Navigation feels cluttered: The admin dashboard buries important configuration options behind multiple menus, which slows down routine tasks. Finding users, groups, or logs takes more clicks than it should. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Lack of granularity: Okta interacts with applications using SCIM, which while useful for group-based provisioning and reviews, does not provide the granularity needed to precisely control access to resources or review that access. Okta’s integrations also do not pull in local account data. This lack of granular visibility and control is not sufficient for many auditors and can create security gaps.
• Pricing leans enterprise: Okta charges more than most competitors, which works for large companies but can strain smaller budgets. The cost makes sense when you need enterprise-grade security, less so for simpler use cases. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Not very beginner-friendly: The setup process assumes you have technical expertise and dedicated IT resources. Smaller teams without identity specialists will struggle with the initial configuration. [Read Full G2 Review]

Pricing

Okta Identity Governance is included in the Essentials Suite at $17 per user per month when billed annually. The suite bundles Access Governance, Lifecycle Management, and 50 Workflows together.

While Okta promotes Identity Governance individually, it’s only available as part of suite packages. Plans come with a minimum $1,500 annual commitment.

3. Microsoft Entra ID

Microsoft Entra ID Governance is Microsoft’s identity and access management solution built directly into the Entra platform (formerly Azure Active Directory).

Organizations that already use Microsoft products get native integration with Microsoft 365, Azure, and thousands of third-party applications without a separate IGA platform.

Key features

• Lifecycle workflows with HR integration: Entra automates user provisioning and de-provisioning by pulling data directly from HR systems like Workday and SuccessFactors.
• Privileged Identity Management (PIM): Time-bound access controls let you grant elevated permissions on a just-in-time basis with automatic expiration.
• Entitlement management with self-service: Users can ask for access to predefined resource packages through a self-service portal, with automated approval workflows based on policies you configure.

Limitations

• On-premises sync issues: The hybrid setup process with Azure AD Connect can get messy, especially when group policies don’t sync correctly between on-premises Active Directory and the cloud. Getting everything aligned often takes longer than expected. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Outdated documentation for integrations: The documentation for complex third-party integrations often feels incomplete or outdated. Teams trying to connect non-Microsoft applications struggle to find current, accurate guidance on how to make everything work together. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Limited outside the Microsoft ecosystem: The platform works best when your entire stack runs on Microsoft technologies. The further you move from a pure Microsoft stack, the more manual work you need to make governance features function smoothly. [Read Full G2 Review]

Pricing

Microsoft offers Entra ID Governance through three paid tiers:

• The P1 plan starts at $6 per user per month and targets enterprise customers and small to medium businesses
• The P2 plan runs $9 per user per month and adds Microsoft 365 E5 integration for enterprise customers
• The Entra Suite costs $12 per user per month and combines governance with network access, identity protection, and other security solutions

4. Oracle Identity Governance

Oracle Identity Governance is an enterprise identity management platform that primarily targets large organizations with more complex IT setups.

It works across cloud and on-premises environments, so it’s also a solid fit for organizations that run hybrid infrastructure or use extensive Oracle applications.

Key features

• Extensive connector library: Oracle provides pre-built connectors for Oracle applications, major enterprise systems, and cloud platforms. The connector framework lets you extend integration to custom applications through REST APIs and customizable templates.
• Scalability for enterprise deployments: Companies can deploy Oracle Identity Governance on-premises, in Oracle Cloud Infrastructure, or in hybrid configurations with high availability and failover support.
• Comprehensive lifecycle automation: The platform automates the complete user journey from onboarding through termination, with workflow-driven provisioning across connected systems.

Limitations

• Bug fixes often depend on patch cycles: When you encounter bugs that block certain changes, your only option is to wait for Oracle to release a patch. This can slow down implementations and leave you stuck until the next patch cycle arrives. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Complex for non-specialists: The terminology and feature set overwhelm users who aren’t deep IAM experts. Even experienced IT professionals find the system hard to navigate without extensive training on Oracle-specific concepts. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Weak reporting and third-party support: The reporting tools lack the flexibility most teams expect, and integration options for non-Oracle systems are limited. Connecting external applications often means custom development work. [Read Full G2 Review]

Pricing

Oracle doesn’t publish pricing for Oracle Identity Governance publicly. We searched Oracle’s official sources and couldn’t find specific numbers listed anywhere on their site.

The platform uses either Named User Plus licensing for organizations with known user counts or Processor-based licensing for larger deployments. You’ll need to contact Oracle sales directly for a quote.

5. SailPoint

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud is another popular cloud-native identity governance platform built on the Atlas platform.

Large organizations choose it because the role mining and AI-driven access modeling are particularly useful when you’re dealing with complex governance at enterprise scale.

Key features

• Advanced certification campaigns: Access reviews include peer group comparisons and AI-driven recommendations that help reviewers make faster decisions.
• Access modeling and role optimization: The platform analyzes access patterns across your organization to recommend optimized roles and detect identity outliers.
• Extensive pre-built connectors: SailPoint offers connectors for hundreds of applications, including deep integrations with major platforms like SAP, Oracle, Workday, and cloud infrastructure providers.

Limitations

• Slow feature rollout: Users say that some platform upgrades take longer to arrive than expected, which can leave you waiting when business needs change quickly. Promised features don’t always materialize on the timeline you need them. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Email-only support slows resolution: Support teams avoid phone calls and stick to email exchanges that stretch simple issues across multiple days. What should be a quick troubleshooting conversation becomes a drawn-out ticket process. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Customization creates technical debt: Heavy customization makes the platform harder to maintain and upgrade over time. Organizations that tailor too much end up with complexity that slows down future changes and creates maintenance headaches. [Read Full G2 Review]

Pricing

SailPoint doesn’t list pricing publicly. You’d have to contact SailPoint sales for a precise quote.

Based on available third-party data, you can expect to pay around $75,000 yearly for smaller deployments, $240,000 for mid-sized operations, and $800,000+ for large enterprises.

Learn more → 10 Best SailPoint Alternatives (Rated by User Reviews) - ConductorOne

6. CyberArk

As the market leader in Privileged Access Management (PAM), CyberArk has spent years perfecting privileged account security. The company recently expanded into broader identity governance through acquisitions, most notably Zilla Security in February 2025.

The platform makes most sense for organizations that want enterprise-grade PAM with governance features bundled together.

Key features

• Industry-leading privileged access controls: The platform manages privileged accounts, secrets, and credentials with session monitoring and recording built in. It keeps least privilege in place through just-in-time elevation and credentials that rotate automatically.
• Modern IGA through Zilla acquisition: The Zilla integration brings AI-powered role management, automated access reviews, and streamlined provisioning that works five times faster than legacy IGA systems, according to customer data.
• AI agent security capabilities: Since AI agents combine human and machine identity traits, the platform manages their lifecycle, handles contextual privileges, and governs them as autonomous systems.

Limitations

• Split between old and new interfaces: The platform introduced a modern user interface, but many administrative tasks still force you back to the older “classic” interface. This creates an inconsistent experience where admins constantly switch between two different UIs. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Documentation gaps can slow you down: Administrators report that finding specific procedures and configuration details isn’t always straightforward. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Support structure lacks efficiency: Large organizations expect direct paths to senior support engineers when problems escalate, but CyberArk’s support structure doesn’t make this easy. [Read Full G2 Review]

Pricing

CyberArk doesn’t publish pricing and asks organizations to contact sales for quotes.

Pricing works on subscriptions tied to users and features, with wide variation based on your deployment and environment.

7. IBM Security Verify

IBM Security Verify is an IAM suite that connects identity governance, access management, and privileged access into one system.

The platform uses business activities instead of roles to track separation of duties, so it’s particularly useful for enterprises with thousands of users that want to keep their compliance frameworks manageable.

Key features

• Business-activity-based risk modeling: The platform maps separation of duties controls to specific business activities. This approach makes compliance violations easier to explain to auditors, since activities like “create purchase order” are more concrete than role-based policies.
• Identity analytics with risk insights: Built-in analytics provide visual dashboards that outline risky users and insider threats based on access patterns and behavior.
• Integration with IBM security ecosystem: The platform connects with other IBM security tools like QRadar SIEM and Trusteer for adaptive authentication that evaluates risk based on device, location, and behavior patterns.

Limitations

• Technical expertise needed upfront: Setup and configuration aren’t intuitive, particularly for teams new to IBM products. Documentation gaps make the process slower than it needs to be. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Higher cost than competitors: The platform carries a higher price tag than most alternatives. Organizations with smaller budgets or mid-market companies may find better value elsewhere. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Manual work for custom app connections: Integrating your own applications means rolling up your sleeves for development work. What looks simple on paper often turns into lengthy projects that drain technical resources. [Read Full G2 Review]

Pricing

IBM Security Verify charges based on resource units (RUs) tied to real-time usage, not flat per-user pricing. You buy RUs annually, and costs are based on how many users you have, which features they use, and how often they log in.

For a 5,000-user deployment, expect around $1.81 per user monthly for SSO, $1.81 for MFA, and $2.13 for lifecycle management. Prices drop if users access the system less than once a month.

8. Omada Identity

Omada Identity is a cloud-native IGA platform that simplifies deployment through structured best practices. The platform combines AI analytics with code-free setup, so teams don’t need developers to configure workflows.

The main value proposition is the Accelerator Package — a guaranteed 12-week deployment with fixed costs and defined milestones that removes the uncertainty from IGA projects.

Key features

• Guaranteed 12-week deployment: Organizations get a connected HR system, full directory integration, governance and self-service features, and a basic role model with automatic access assignments. The program runs on fixed costs with clear milestones at each stage.
• Code-free workflow configuration: Teams can build and modify workflows through a drag-and-drop interface without technical expertise. This both speeds up implementation and simplifies system upgrades.
• Natural language access requests: Users can ask for access by describing what they need in plain language instead of jumping through forms or technical menus. The platform interprets requests, applies appropriate policies, and routes approvals automatically.

Limitations

• Confusing menu organization: Menu labels don’t always match what you’re looking for, which makes the learning curve steeper than it should be. New administrators often search through multiple sections before finding basic functions like user lookup. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Performance slowdowns during operations: The system can lag during startup and occasionally freeze for short periods during routine tasks. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Outdated interface design: The user interface feels dated compared to modern cloud platforms, even though the security capabilities are strong. The visual design hasn’t kept pace with current UX standards. [Read Full G2 Review]

Pricing

The platform uses annual per-user pricing that varies by deployment size and feature set. Omada doesn’t list specific costs publicly, so you’ll need to reach out to their sales team for custom quotes.

9. One Identity Manager

One Identity Manager is an enterprise IGA platform built for large organizations that need to manage complex identity environments.

The platform handles governance across users, applications, data, and privileged accounts, with deep integration capabilities for systems like SAP and Active Directory that enterprise teams rely on daily.

Key features

• Behavior-driven governance with usage analytics: The platform monitors application logins and compares them to assigned access rights to spot permissions nobody uses. If a user hasn’t touched an application within a defined window, the system revokes the permissions automatically.
• Flexible identity lifecycle automation: Organizations can automate onboarding, role changes, and offboarding across 100+ applications with role-based access control and policy-driven provisioning.
• Audit-ready compliance reporting: Built-in templates support GDPR, HIPAA, SOX, and PCI DSS requirements with granular access reports that show who has access to what resources.

Limitations

• Incomplete documentation for key modules: Key features come with sparse documentation that doesn’t explain functionality thoroughly. Teams end up stuck when they hit complex scenarios that aren’t covered in the available materials. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Active Directory sync doesn’t work reliably: The system fails to synchronize with AD environments despite forced sync attempts. Administrators resort to PowerShell scripts on domain controllers for syncs, and basic group management becomes unnecessarily complex. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Non-intuitive interface design: The setup process provides no guidance for users unfamiliar with the platform. New administrators find it difficult to navigate without tutorials because the interface doesn’t make functions obvious or accessible. [Read Full G2 Review]

Pricing

One Identity Manager charges per user annually with tiered pricing that scales by company size. The company doesn’t publish rates publicly.

10. RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle

RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle is an IGA platform that’s primarily built for security-sensitive organizations like government agencies, banks, healthcare providers, and energy companies.

While Saviynt pushes cloud-first deployments, RSA offers full-featured on-prem options with the same features as its cloud version, so it’s a stronger fit for enterprises that want to keep identity governance in their own data centers.

Key features

• AI-powered ISPM dashboards: The platform uses AI to analyze identity data across your entire identity cloud environment and outline risks like orphaned accounts, excessive permissions, and policy violations.
• Risk-based access governance: The platform takes a governance-first approach that prioritizes access issues based on risk levels informed by intelligence.
• Automated lifecycle management: Organizations can automate joiner-mover-leaver processes across applications without custom coding. The platform handles onboarding, role changes, and offboarding through policy-driven workflows.

Limitations

• Not beginner-friendly for implementation: Advanced customization options and platform complexity create barriers for less technical teams. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Visually outdated interface: The user interface hasn’t kept pace with modern design standards and looks old compared to competitors. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Time-consuming authentication process: Authentication through the time-to-live access feature runs slower than expected. [Read Full G2 Review]

Pricing

RSA doesn’t publish pricing for Identity Governance and Lifecycle on its website, so organizations need to contact sales for custom quotes.

We did find that the platform uses per-user monthly subscription pricing, with costs that vary based on deployment type and organization size.

11. Lumos

Lumos is a next-generation identity governance platform built specifically for cloud-native organizations that can’t afford the 6-12 month implementations typical of legacy systems.

The platform makes sense for cloud-native organizations dealing with SaaS sprawl who want modern IGA that works at the speed of their business, not the pace of traditional enterprise software.

Key features

• Delta access reviews with AI-powered approvals: Access reviews only show what changed since the last time, instead of making you re-review everything. The AI approves or rejects requests based on what similar employees have and how people use their access.
• Unified SaaS management and license optimization: The platform tracks your software spending and spots licenses nobody uses anymore so you can reclaim them. It also finds shadow IT and brings them under your governance without any separate tools.
• Just-in-time access with self-service portal: Employees request apps through a store-like interface that works right inside Slack, Teams, or the command line. The system grants temporary access based on your policies and removes it automatically when the time runs out.

Limitations

• Unclear access visibility in the interface: The UI doesn’t always make it obvious when employees already have access to something or what level of permissions they hold. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Missing compliance metadata for connected apps: The platform doesn’t display security certifications or compliance requirements (like SOC 2 status) for the SaaS applications in your stack. Teams say that they need to track this information separately. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Limited scheduling options for access reviews: You can’t set up automated quarterly or recurring access review campaigns within the platform. [Read Full G2 Review]

Pricing

Lumos uses custom pricing and doesn’t list rates publicly. You need to contact sales for a quote based on your company’s size and feature needs.

ConductorOne – The ideal Saviynt alternative

Traditional IGA platforms like Saviynt handle enterprise governance well once you get them running, but getting there means months of work with professional services teams and ongoing maintenance that ties up resources.

ConductorOne gives you a faster path. Pre-built connectors link to your systems without custom development, the interface works like tools your team already knows, and automation handles the repetitive work that bogs down legacy platforms.

Here’s what makes ConductorOne different:

• Deploy in 30 days on average using 300+ ready-to-use connectors that work without custom integration projects
• Run the platform with your current Security and IT teams using a user-friendly interface that makes sense without specialized IGA training
• Automate the full identity lifecycle from onboarding through role changes to offboarding without manual work
• Grant time-limited access on demand that expires automatically instead of managing permanent privileges that pile up
• Integrate with your existing tools through Terraform, webhooks, and open APIs without fighting proprietary limitations
• Leverage platform-native AI agents to handle routine tasks and provide contextual, risk-based recommendations to human approvers.

Zscaler experienced this difference first hand when they cut new hire provisioning from weeks to 10 minutes, saved 156 hours in engineering hire provisioning time, and saw a 60% reduction in help desk access provisioning tickets.

“One of the key differentiators we found with ConductorOne was their security-first approach to solving access.” - Dheeraj Malik, Director of Corporate Applications

If you want enterprise-grade identity governance without the complexity that typically comes with it, book a demo to see how ConductorOne makes IGA work for your team.

FAQs

How does an IGA platform differ from my single sign-on (SSO) provider?

Your SSO provider confirms identity and logs users into applications with a single set of credentials.

On the other hand, an IGA platform manages the permissions that users have once they’re logged in—what they can access, who approved it, how long they should keep it, and when it gets removed.

Put simply, SSO answers “who are you?” while IGA answers “what should you be able to do?”

How does an IGA solution help achieve a zero-trust architecture?

Zero trust operates on the principle that you verify everything and trust nothing by default, which means users should only have access to exactly what they need, exactly when they need it.

IGA platforms enforce this through just-in-time access that grants temporary permissions on demand, automated reviews that catch excessive privileges, and policies that revoke access the moment it’s no longer needed.

How do modern alternatives improve audit trails and remediation?

Modern IGA platforms log every access change, approval, and review automatically, so you have a complete record of who authorized what and when without manually compiling data from different systems.

When auditors need evidence or you find out about risky permissions, you can pull the full history instantly and see the chain of decisions that led to the current state.

Our environment is multi-cloud. How do these modern IGA tools handle governance across all platforms?

Modern IGA platforms connect to multiple cloud providers, SaaS applications, and on-premises systems through pre-built and custom integrations that work across your entire environment.

You basically get one unified view of all identities and permissions regardless of where they are — AWS, Azure, GCP, your internal tools, or anywhere else.

The platform governs access consistently across all these systems using the same policies and workflows, so you don’t need separate governance processes for each cloud provider or application stack.