8 Best Okta Identity Governance Alternatives for 2026

If you’re running Okta Workforce Identity, your authentication stack probably works well. Employees get seamless SSO across every application, MFA works reliably, and provisioning happens when users log in for the first time.

But authentication is only half the identity problem.

Your onboarding process still runs through dozens of Jira (or other helpdesk) tickets, user access reviews pile up in spreadsheets that nobody wants to own, and when someone leaves, you may be manually tracking down what they had access to across 40 different systems.

Okta Identity Governance (OIG) was built to close this gap. And if you’re already on Okta Workforce Identity, adding OIG may seem like an obvious move. But for many teams, the functionality, pricing structure, and deployment timeline often don’t align with what you’re trying to solve.

These are the 8 most popular alternatives for modern identity governance.

Why look for an alternative to Okta Identity Governance?

For large enterprises running complex identity environments, Okta Identity Governance brings depth and integration with the broader Okta platform. Teams already using Okta get tighter integration and a single vendor relationship.

But G2 reviews show where OIG gets complex:

• Integration gaps with certain applications: Okta advertises connectivity to thousands of apps, but not every integration works smoothly out of the box. What looks like a supported integration might lead to hours of SAML troubleshooting. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Steep learning curve for teams without IGA experience: The platform assumes a level of IGA knowledge that many teams simply don’t have yet. Without prior identity governance experience, organizations end up relying on consultants or extended vendor support just to get through implementation. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Pricing that doesn’t scale down well: The pricing model makes sense at enterprise scale, but becomes difficult to justify for mid-market organizations. The per-user model and feature gating through add-ons mean smaller teams often price themselves out before completing evaluation. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Implementation friction with app activation: Documentation covers the basics, but actual app activation often involves troubleshooting that isn’t documented well. Teams find themselves working directly with third-party vendors to handle integration issues that should have been straightforward. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Limited UI customization options: The interface brings limited flexibility for companies that need custom branding or workflow adaptations. Teams trying to align the platform with internal standards or specific operational needs run into customization walls quickly. [Read Full G2 Review]

Key features and functionalities to look for in an Okta Identity Governance alternative

The best alternative to Okta IGA depends entirely on what your team needs most, whether that’s simpler implementation, better pricing transparency, key governance functionality, or integrations that work without custom development.

Some features are non-negotiable for any IGA platform, while others only matter depending on your environment.

Here’s what to prioritize when evaluating alternatives:

Fast deployment without professional services

Enterprise IGA implementations can drag on for months because they require professional services to configure, customize, and connect your applications.

Okta IGA isn’t immune to this. Between learning Okta Workflows and setting up Access Governance components, you’re looking at an extended ramp-up time.

Modern AI-native platforms handle this problem differently. The best alternatives let you deploy core governance in weeks, with clear documentation and templates you can use immediately.

True best-of-breed and IdP-agnostic governance

Okta Identity Governance only works if you’re already running Okta Workforce Identity. The platform wasn’t built to govern user identities managed in Azure AD, Google Workspace, or other IdPs.

Best-of-breed alternatives work with whatever authentication layer you already have in place, whether that’s Auth0, Ping Identity, or any other IdP. You get governance without replacing your entire identity stack or locking yourself into one ecosystem.

Automated provisioning without role management complexity

Role-based access control sounds great in theory, but maintaining roles over time becomes a full-time job. Okta IGA and similar platforms expect you to define roles, keep them updated as your organization changes, and troubleshoot when they break.

Modern platforms use attribute-based provisioning instead, and align with zero-trust security principles where access grants happen dynamically based on current employee attributes. New hires get access based on department, title, and manager without building and maintaining complex role structures.

Deep connectivity to infrastructure and on-premise apps

Okta IGA works fine for SaaS apps, but falls short when you need to govern on-premise applications, databases, or cloud infrastructure. If your environment includes Active Directory groups, legacy ERP systems, or AWS resources, you’re building custom integrations through Okta Workflows.

Better alternatives handle the full spectrum from day one. They govern access to on-premise applications, infrastructure platforms, and SaaS tools with the same level of native support.

Faster time-to-value for a lower TCO

Total cost of ownership for Okta IGA includes the platform licensing, workflows add-on, professional services for implementation, and months of internal time to configure everything. The total investment before you see any governance value becomes hard to justify for mid-market budgets.

Modern platforms compress both timelines and costs. You skip the consultant fees, avoid the multi-month ramp-up, and start managing governance problems within weeks of signing the contract.

Top alternatives to Okta Identity Governance to consider

Finding the right Okta IGA alternative depends on which category fits your needs.

For example, modern cloud-native platforms bring governance fast with minimal implementation burden, while Microsoft Entra ID Governance competes directly with Okta for organizations already invested in the Microsoft ecosystem.

Then, there are traditional enterprise IGA suites that handle the most complex governance needs but come with the implementation timelines and costs to match.

Each alternative below approaches governance differently, with trade-offs between speed, depth, and ease of use worth understanding before you make a decision:

1. ConductorOne
2. Microsoft Entra ID Governance
3. Saviynt
4. Zluri
5. Lumos
6. Oracle Identity Governance
7. Symantec IGA
8. Omada Identity

1. ConductorOne

ConductorOne is a modern, AI-native identity governance platform that automates access controls, applies least-privilege security, and provides unified visibility across all cloud and on-premises systems.

ConductorOne works as an Okta IGA alternative because it shows you granular entitlements like specific permissions, resources, and roles, not just group memberships.

Where Okta makes you manually build governance policies through Workflows, ConductorOne provides no-code automation and finds service accounts, orphaned identities, and nested permissions that Okta misses.

Key solutions

• Unified Identity Graph for complete access visibility: The Unified Identity Graph centralizes identity and access data from every connected system into a single view that shows who has access to what across your entire environment.
• Just-in-time access with auto-provisioning and revocation: Users request temporary access to applications, infrastructure, or specific resources through Slack or the web app, and ConductorOne automatically provisions access after approval.
• 300+ connectors for cloud, on-prem, and homegrown apps: Lightweight connectors integrate with SaaS applications, cloud infrastructure (AWS, Azure, GCP), directories, and on-premises systems in days. The platform handles non-SCIM-enabled apps, homegrown tools, and legacy systems that Okta IGA simply can’t govern.

• AI-powered access Copilot for intelligent automation: Access Copilot analyzes risk across your identity data and provides contextual recommendations during access reviews and approval decisions.
• Identity lifecycle automation with dynamic provisioning: The platform automates onboarding and offboarding through multi-step workflows that provision access based on employee attributes like department, role, and manager. When someone’s role changes or they leave the company, ConductorOne dynamically adjusts or removes their access across all connected systems.

Why do companies choose ConductorOne over Okta Identity Governance?

• Purpose-built for governance instead of bolted-on features: Okta IGA bundles Lifecycle Management and Workflows products into an awkward governance solution that needs manual workflow building for basic tasks. ConductorOne was built from the ground up as a unified governance platform with no-code automation and intuitive workflows that don’t force you to become a Workflows expert.
• Works with any IdP without vendor lock-in: Okta IGA only functions if you’re running Okta Workforce Identity as your authentication layer. ConductorOne operates as a best-of-breed solution that integrates with Okta, Microsoft Entra ID, Google Workspace, or any other identity provider. You can add governance without replacing your entire identity stack.
• Native support for on-prem, homegrown, and non-SCIM apps: Okta’s governance capabilities work reasonably well for SCIM-enabled SaaS apps but fall short when you need to govern on-premise systems, legacy applications, databases, or cloud infrastructure. ConductorOne provides native connectors for these environments from day one and handles the full spectrum of enterprise apps without custom development.
• Enterprise-scale performance without artificial limits: Okta IGA limits access review campaigns to 100,000 items or 50 resources and recommends splitting larger reviews into smaller campaigns for better performance. ConductorOne handles enterprise-scale reviews with over 1 million items without any performance degradation or artificial restrictions.

What real customers are saying about ConductorOne

ConductorOne works with any identity provider you’re already running. For example, Zscaler built on top of its Okta IdP with ConductorOne and dropped new hire provisioning time from weeks to just 10 minutes, while also reducing help desk provisioning tickets by 60%.

Brex took a similar approach when they integrated ConductorOne with Okta to manage access as code through Terraform. They automated 50,000 access requests and cut operational costs across their GRC and IT teams.

DigitalOcean faced a different problem with manual, spreadsheet-based access reviews that couldn’t scale for SOC 2 and SOX compliance. After deploying ConductorOne, they hit a 100% on-time completion rate and slashed review effort by 85%.

2. Microsoft Entra ID Governance

Microsoft built Entra ID Governance as an add-on to Azure AD that brings enterprise IGA features to organizations already invested in the Microsoft ecosystem.

It handles automated provisioning, periodic access reviews, and self-service access tickets through pre-built workflows that connect directly to Microsoft 365, Azure resources, and enterprise apps.

This is the natural Okta IGA alternative for Microsoft shops that don’t want to introduce a third-party governance layer.

Key features

• Lifecycle Workflows for automated provisioning: Pre-built templates automate employee onboarding, role changes, and offboarding without custom code. The platform sends welcome emails with temporary passwords and removes access when employees leave.
• Entitlement Management with access packages: Access packages bundle applications, groups, and SharePoint sites into a single request that users can approve through self-service portals. Business owners control approvals without IT involvement.
• Native Microsoft ecosystem integration: The platform governs access to Microsoft 365, Windows Active Directory, Azure resources, and SharePoint without custom connectors. It pulls user data directly from Azure AD and enforces policies across the entire Microsoft stack.

Limitations

• Steep learning curve for advanced configurations: Basic features like access reviews and lifecycle workflows work well out of the box, but teams need technical expertise for more advanced scenarios. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Slow admin console and limited API functionality: The web-based admin interface struggles with performance during daily administrative tasks, particularly for organizations managing thousands of identities. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Platform constraints from legacy architecture: The underlying infrastructure carries technical debt from older Microsoft identity products that creates operational friction. [Read Full G2 Review]

Pricing

Microsoft structures Entra ID Governance pricing across three subscription levels:

• P1 starts at $6 per user monthly and serves both enterprise and SMB markets
• P2 increases to $9 per user per month and brings the Microsoft 365 E5 integration for enterprise deployments
• The Entra Suite, priced at $12 per user monthly, bundles governance capabilities with network access, identity protection, and robust security features

3. Saviynt

Saviynt is an enterprise IGA platform purpose-built for organizations that manage complex hybrid and multi-cloud environments with thousands of identities.

The platform primarily targets large enterprises that need comprehensive oversight of access rights across SAP, AWS, Azure, and other complex apps that lightweight IGA tools can’t properly manage.

Key features

• Deep application connectors for enterprise systems: Saviynt provides entitlement visibility into complex applications like SAP S/4HANA, Oracle EBS, and AWS that other IGA platforms treat as black boxes.
• AI-powered access intelligence and recommendations: Machine learning analyzes how employees use applications and then recommends access based on what peers in similar roles need.
• Identity warehouse with cross-application analytics: All identity and entitlement data from connected systems flows into a centralized warehouse that enables cross-application risk queries. Security teams can spot dormant accounts and run custom compliance reports.

Limitations

• Support tickets drag without resolution: Getting to the root cause of technical issues needs multiple ticket escalations and lengthy back-and-forth exchanges. Support meetings might even repeat information from tickets without advancing toward resolution. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Admin interface lacks modern navigation: Common configuration tasks involve multiple screens and non-intuitive workflows that slow down daily IT operations. Teams familiar with modern SaaS platforms find the interface frustrating compared to newer IGA tools. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Some events create duplicate identity records: Organizational changes like department transfers or employee ID modifications sometimes create duplicate identity records. The platform doesn’t always reconcile these changes cleanly, so teams have to manually merge or delete duplicate accounts. [Read Full G2 Review]

Pricing

Saviynt offers three tiers based on organizational needs and scale:

• Essentials provides core capabilities for organizations that are just starting their identity security programs
• Pro removes limits on applications and identities for companies that scale enterprise-wide
• Premier serves regulated industries with complete coverage and integrates insights from other identity solutions

All Saviynt-built connectors are included in tier pricing. Pricing scales up or down as identity counts change.

4. Zluri

Zluri started as a SaaS management platform and then later added identity governance to solve access problems at the application layer.

While Okta IGA locks you into Okta’s identity stack, Zluri works with any IdP and manages both federated and non-federated applications through direct integrations and browser agents.

Key features

• Nine-method app discovery engine: The platform finds every application in use across the organization through seamless integration with IdPs, finance systems, HRMS platforms, browser agents, desktop agents, device management solutions, CASBs, MDMs, and direct API connections.
• Instant lifecycle automation: New hire provisioning and termination deprovisioning happen within minutes of HR system updates rather than the 24-hour batch cycles common in traditional IGA tools.
• Group-level access reviews across multiple IdPs: The platform includes access certification at the single sign-on group level across Azure AD, Google Workspace, Okta, and JumpCloud simultaneously.

Limitations

• Analytics lag behind for time-sensitive decisions: Analytics and reporting dashboards don’t update instantly, which creates lag in seeing the current state for organizations managing thousands of users. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Integration coverage gaps for niche applications: The platform’s 300+ connectors cover popular SaaS applications well, but less common enterprise tools often lack full integration support. Organizations using specialized or industry-specific software may need to wait for connector development on the roadmap. [Read Full G2 Review]
• User experience lacks polish in key areas: Navigation through the platform doesn’t always follow intuitive paths, so routine tasks can sometimes seem harder than they should be. [Read Full G2 Review]

Pricing

Zluri uses custom pricing based on the number of employees, managed applications, and selected modules. You’ll have to contact their sales team for a direct quote.

5. Lumos

Lumos is an identity platform where automation handles most governance tasks without constant administrator input. Albus, the platform’s AI agent, watches access patterns and creates role policies based on peer behavior and usage data.

Okta IGA puts the configuration burden on administrators through Workflows, while Lumos targets organizations that want governance to operate more independently through continuous machine learning.

Key features

• AI-generated policy recommendations with Albus: The Albus agent analyzes HRIS data, application assignments, and usage logs to outline access patterns and generate RBAC policies automatically.
• Delta access reviews that show only changes: Access certification campaigns show only what changed since the last review cycle, so reviewers don’t have to evaluate all permissions every time.
• Self-service app store with policy enforcement: Employees can ask for application access through an internal app store interface that shows available tools and routes approvals to appropriate stakeholders.

Limitations

• The feature set is still maturing as a newer platform: Lumos entered the IGA market relatively recently, and the product roadmap shows features still under development that competitors already offer. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Steep learning curve despite autonomous positioning: Teams still need to invest quite a bit of time and effort to understand how the AI agent operates and how to set up policies for optimal results. [Read Full G2 Review]
• UI may create friction for users and administrators: The interface doesn’t clearly communicate existing access to employees, so it can create confusion about what permissions people already hold. App owners need better administrative controls, particularly for manually managing time-bound access that shouldn’t wait for automatic expiration. [Read Full G2 Review]

Pricing

Lumos uses custom pricing that isn’t available online. Contact their sales team to get a quote tailored to your company’s size and feature requirements.

6. Oracle Identity Governance

Oracle Identity Governance is an enterprise-grade identity and access management (IAM) solution built for companies that are running complex hybrid environments with both on-premises apps and cloud services.

The platform handles complete user lifecycle management with deep connectivity to Oracle’s ecosystem and broad support for third-party apps through its Identity Connector Framework.

Key features

• Customizable certification campaigns for compliance: Access reviews can target specific users, roles, applications, or entitlements based on audit-driven assessments that focus on high-risk permissions or regulatory rules like SOX and GDPR.
• Flexible deployment across cloud and on-premises: Organizations can deploy OIG entirely on-premises, run it in Oracle Cloud Infrastructure, or use a hybrid model where Oracle Access Governance in the cloud provides analytics while OIG handles core provisioning on-premises.
• Identity Connector Framework for extensive application coverage: Oracle includes a standardized connector architecture that supports hundreds of enterprise applications, including SAP, Microsoft Active Directory, Workday, Salesforce, and Oracle’s own suite of business applications.

Limitations

• Fragmented admin experience across multiple consoles: Some reviews mention that administrators need to switch between separate interfaces to complete governance tasks, which slows down daily operations. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Specialized skill needs increase staffing costs: The platform needs administrators with specific OIG knowledge that’s hard to find and expensive to acquire. Organizations face ongoing costs either training internal teams or paying premium salaries for Oracle specialists. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Clunky interface hampers administrator productivity: Routine administrative tasks involve working through multiple application screens without clear navigation paths. [Read Full G2 Review]

Pricing

Oracle Identity Governance pricing isn’t available publicly. They offer Named User Plus licensing when you have a specific user count and processor-based licensing for bigger rollouts.

You’ll need to reach out to their sales team for concrete pricing.

7. Symantec IGA

Symantec IGA (formerly CA Identity Suite) is Broadcom’s enterprise IGA platform packaged as a Virtual Appliance for on-premises, cloud, or hybrid deployment.

The platform handles provisioning, role management, and entitlement reviews through a unified appliance model that works with existing adaptive authentication infrastructure.

Key features

• Unified Virtual Appliance simplifies deployment: All IGA components come packaged in a single appliance that deploys across VMware, AWS, Azure, or other platforms.
• Automated certification campaigns with mobile access: Access reviews run through customizable workflows that route to appropriate approvers based on organizational structure. Business owners complete certifications through mobile-optimized, user-friendly interfaces that work across endpoint devices.
• Inline policy validation prevents violations: The platform checks conditional access requests against policies during provisioning workflows, so it can block unauthorized access before it gets granted.

Limitations

• Expensive licensing and implementation: The platform carries premium pricing that drives up both purchase costs and deployment expenses. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Web portal performance lags behind standalone tools: The web-based interface runs slower compared to more specialized standalone administration tools. This performance gap is especially noticeable during routine administrative tasks that slow down daily operations. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Poor admin experience with too many clicks: Backend administration forces users through multiple screens to reach basic functions. This excessive clicking creates a frustrating experience that slows down administrative workflows. [Read Full G2 Review]

Pricing

Broadcom uses custom pricing for Symantec IGA based on the number of users and deployment scope. It’s in the mid-range tier with negotiable pricing for enterprise deals.

Pricing depends on user count, selected components, and support needs, so you’ll need to contact sales directly.

8. Omada Identity

Omada Identity is a cloud-native IGA platform with a guaranteed 12-week deployment through its Accelerator package.

The platform works independently from your authentication layer and configures without custom code, so it’s more flexible compared to Okta IGA’s ecosystem lock-in.

Key features

• 12-week guaranteed deployment with Accelerator package: Omada’s fixed-price Accelerator follows a five-step process that activates the solution, connects authoritative sources, sets up reporting, and trains teams within 12 weeks.
• IdentityPROCESS+ best-practice framework built into the platform: The framework packages 20 years of IGA deployment experience into pre-configured workflows for comprehensive identity lifecycle management, access governance, and compliance.
• Configurable connectivity framework for hybrid environments: The platform connects to HR systems, Active Directory, cloud applications, and on-premises systems through a configuration-based framework.

Limitations

• Non-intuitive interface labels create confusion: Menu terminology doesn’t match end user expectations, so it can make routine tasks harder to complete. You need to be familiar with Omada’s specific naming conventions to complete basic functions. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Complex initial deployment and slow performance: Getting the platform configured takes considerable time and effort during the setup phase. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Dated UI despite strong functionality: The interface design looks older compared to modern SaaS platforms, even though the underlying governance features work well. [Read Full G2 Review]

Pricing

Omada charges per user annually, with costs that depend on how big your deployment is and which features you need.

They don’t publish pricing publicly, so companies have to contact their sales team for a quote.

How to choose the right Okta alternative for your needs

Choosing the right Okta IGA alternative comes down to matching platform capabilities with your specific governance needs and organizational constraints.

The platform that works for a 5,000-employee enterprise won’t necessarily fit a 500-person company, and what matters most depends on whether you’re prioritizing deployment speed or deep system connectivity.

Here’s how to choose the right alternative for your specific organization:

Step 1: Identify your core identity challenge (IdP vs. IGA)

Identity providers (IdPs) handle authentication. They manage how users log into applications through SSO, enforce multi-factor authentication, support passwordless login methods, and maintain user directories.

If employees can’t access their applications or you’re managing too many passwords, you have an IdP problem. Platforms like Okta Workforce Identity, Azure AD, Google Workspace, Keycloak, and OAuth-based providers handle this.

Identity governance (IGA) manages who has access to what. It automates provisioning when employees join, removes access when they leave, runs certification campaigns for compliance, and applies secure access policies across systems.

If you’re manually tracking permissions in spreadsheets or failing audit requirements, you have a governance problem. This is what Okta Identity Governance streamlines.

The platforms we covered in this guide focus mainly on governance, not authentication. They assume your IdP works fine and you need better control over your access management solution.

• If your authentication works but governance doesn’t, you want an IGA-only solution. Keep your existing IdP and add governance on top. Most alternatives in this guide (ConductorOne, Saviynt, Zluri, and Lumos) follow this approach.
• If both authentication and governance need replacing, you’re choosing between integrated platforms and best-of-breed tools. Integrated platforms like Microsoft Entra ID Governance offer tighter integration but lock you into one vendor’s ecosystem. Best-of-breed IGA tools work with any IdP, but you’ll have to manage separate systems.

Step 2: Evaluate integration and architectural compatibility

Start by listing the systems your IGA platform must connect to on Day 1. Your HR system comes first because it’s the authoritative source for who works at your company.

Next is your directory service (Active Directory, Azure AD, Google Workspace), followed by your five most important business applications. Everything else can wait.

Check whether platforms offer pre-built connectors for these specific systems. “Supports integration” doesn’t mean much if it needs three months of custom development. Look for native connectors that work out of the box.

Your environment type determines which platforms fit:

• Cloud-only organizations running SaaS applications need platforms with strong SCIM support and pre-built connectors for popular cloud apps. Avoid enterprise platforms built for complex hybrid environments (you’ll pay for features you don’t need).
• Hybrid environments with both cloud and on-premises systems need platforms that handle Active Directory, LDAP, legacy databases, and cloud applications equally well. Many modern IGA tools focus heavily on SaaS connectivity but provide weaker support for on-premises systems.
• Complex enterprises running SAP, Oracle EBS, or mainframe systems need platforms with deep connectors for these specialized environments. Standard SCIM integrations won’t reach the entitlement-level detail these systems need.

Keep in mind that integration claims often sound broader than they are. A platform might connect to your ERP for basic user provisioning, but miss the entitlement management and role control use cases that governance needs.

Step 3: Assess your security and compliance requirements

Your compliance situation determines what you need versus what’s just nice to have. A startup chasing its first SOC 2 audit has different problems than a bank dealing with SOX controls.

What you need depends on your risk profile:

• Low-risk environments (early-stage companies, non-regulated industries) need basic access reviews, audit trails, and automated offboarding. You can run quarterly certification campaigns manually and don’t need real-time policy enforcement.
• Medium-risk organizations (growing companies pursuing SOC 2 or ISO 27001) need automated reporting, scheduled certification campaigns, and audit trails that satisfy auditors. Platforms should generate compliance evidence without building spreadsheets manually.
• High-risk organizations (banks, healthcare, SOX-regulated companies) need segregation of duties controls, real-time violation alerts, risk scoring, and comprehensive audit capabilities. Regulatory penalties make governance failures expensive, so you can’t treat them casually.

Some features are non-negotiable, while others only matter for heavily regulated environments:

Don’t over-buy features you don’t need. Risk scoring and behavioral analytics sound great, but they bring unnecessary expenses and complexity when you just need to pass SOC 2.

Learn more: A Practical Approach to Achieving Zero Standing Privileges (ZSP)

Step 4: Consider TCO, scalability, and your organizational needs

You need to account for implementation, integrations, and ongoing maintenance.

Modern platforms like ConductorOne and Omada compress these costs through faster deployment, while enterprise platforms like Oracle and Saviynt need extensive professional services.

You also need to think about where you’ll be in three years. Ask vendors how costs change when you double headcount or add twenty new applications. Some pricing stays predictable as you grow, while others jump at certain thresholds and catch you off guard.

Lastly, choose platforms your team can handle. Even the most sophisticated option is worthless if you can’t get it running in the first place.

These are some common trade-offs teams have to make:

• Fast deployment vs. comprehensive features: Modern platforms go live in weeks with solid core capabilities; enterprise tools take months but cover edge cases
• Simple operations vs. deep control: Cloud platforms handle maintenance automatically; on-premises gives you customization at the cost of complexity
• Predictable costs vs. lower entry price: Modern platforms cost more upfront but deploy faster; enterprise platforms have cheaper licenses but expensive implementation

Your compliance deadline often makes the decision for you. If you need governance operational before next quarter’s audit, rule out platforms that come with six-month implementations regardless of their features.

Sometimes, good enough governance now beats perfect governance eventually.

ConductorOne – the ideal OIG alternative

Okta IGA comes with two main constraints – it only functions within the Okta ecosystem, and it governs access at the group level. Individual permissions fall outside its scope, and you’ll spend time building basic governance policies from scratch in Workflows.

On the other hand, ConductorOne functions as a cloud-based, best-of-breed solution that works with any IdP, gives you entitlement-level detail down to specific permissions and resources, and goes live in weeks through no-code automation.

Here’s exactly what ConductorOne brings to the table:

• Unified Identity Graph that centralizes access to data from cloud, on-prem, and homegrown systems into a single view
• Just-in-time access with automatic provisioning and revocation that removes standing privileges without blocking productivity
• 300+ native connectors that govern SaaS apps, cloud infrastructure, legacy systems, and non-SCIM applications
• AI-powered Access Copilot that provides risk-based recommendations and automates helpdesk ticket processing
• Dynamic lifecycle automation that provisions and adjusts access based on employee attributes without manual tickets
• Enterprise-scale performance that handles reviews with over 1 million items without artificial limits or degradation

Organizations replacing manual processes see the difference right away. DailyPay ** ** was drowning in 300 monthly AWS access request tickets before deploying ConductorOne’s JIT access and Terraform integration, which saved them 20 hours per month.

If you’re evaluating Okta IGA and need governance that works with your existing identity stack without months-long implementations, book a demo with ConductorOne to explore what’s possible.