11 Top-Rated Lumos Alternatives for 2026

Lumos works for companies at a specific stage where lighter governance makes the most sense. Maybe you’ve outgrown manual access processes but don’t need full enterprise IGA yet.

The platform manages access requests through Slack, offers a self-service app portal, and monitors which SaaS tools teams use. For organizations that need identity controls before they can staff a full governance program, this approach may fit.

But that focused scope has limits. The simplicity that works early becomes restrictive as needs evolve. Granular access controls aren’t there, compliance workflows are basic, and integrations expect modern APIs that older infrastructure doesn’t have.

The identity governance market offers different trade-offs. Some optimize for fast deployment and ease of use, while others handle complex enterprise needs and strict compliance mandates. Many try to balance both. The right choice depends on where you are now and what problems you need to solve next.

Here are 11 platforms worth considering if Lumos doesn’t fit your needs, according to real reviews from users.

Why look for an alternative to Lumos?

For its target organizations, Lumos works as advertised. Users appreciate the intuitive interface, fast setup, SaaS spend insights, and how access requests flow naturally through Slack.

But the G2 reviews show where teams usually hit walls:

• Steeper learning curve than expected: The platform takes more time to master than the marketing suggests. Some teams spend weeks figuring out workflows and configurations, even with help from Lumos support. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Limited administrative controls: The platform doesn’t give app owners enough power to manage their own users. You can’t easily revoke access or see at a glance who already has permissions to what. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Narrow integration library: Lumos integrates with popular SaaS apps, but the catalog feels thin. Companies end up with governance coverage on some tools while others stay outside the platform. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Missing security context: Security metadata isn’t built into the app catalog. Admins want compliance status visible when employees browse apps, not buried in external documentation. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Support relies too heavily on documentation: Support channels push users toward self-service resources first. Complex problems that need human troubleshooting take longer to resolve without live support access. [Read Full G2 Review]

Key features and functionalities to look for in a Lumos alternative

What you need from an alternative comes down to where Lumos falls short for your use case. Some organizations may need more integrations, others need stronger compliance features, and many want more administrative flexibility.

These are the capabilities worth comparing across platforms:

Broad and deep application connectivity

Identity governance only works when the platform connects to your full application estate. Lumos focuses primarily on SaaS apps, which creates blind spots if your environment includes on-prem or legacy systems.

Look for platforms that provide:

• Pre-built connectors for hundreds of enterprise applications
• Native integration with AWS, Azure, and GCP at the infrastructure level
• Support for on-premises, legacy, and custom-built applications

When the platform only covers part of your tech stack, you end up with governance for some apps and workarounds for the rest. That split approach creates the exact gaps you’re trying to close.

Automated identity lifecycle management

Access management breaks down when it depends on humans remembering to update permissions. The platform should detect employee changes and respond immediately with the right access adjustments.

New hires get provisioned automatically, role and attribute changes trigger access reviews and updates, and terminated employees lose all permissions before they finish their exit interview. Automation here protects you from the access creep and orphaned accounts that manual processes create.

Self-service requests and just-in-time (JIT) access

Employees need access to tools when work demands it, not three days later after approvals are clear. Self-service portals let users request what they need while routing those tickets through the right approval chains automatically.

Just-in-time provisioning grants access for specific time periods (not permanently), reducing standing privileges and limiting exposure. This approach balances speed with control instead of forcing a choice between security and productivity.

Automated access reviews

Access accumulates over time as people change roles, join projects, and take on new responsibilities. Manual reviews of access mean sending spreadsheets to managers once or twice a year, then chasing them for weeks to get responses.

Automated access certification runs on schedules you define, routes reviews to the right approvers, and tracks decisions in audit trails. The platform shows managers what each person has, provides risk-based insights to guide decision-making, and makes it easy to certify or revoke with just a few clicks.

Multi-environment support (cloud, hybrid, on-prem)

Few enterprises have cloud-only infrastructure. Lumos assumes a SaaS-heavy environment, which works until you need to govern database access, on-premises applications, or infrastructure that can’t move to the cloud.

Alternative platforms should handle AWS and Azure alongside your data center, legacy ERP systems, and everything in between. This unified approach prevents the split governance model, where cloud gets automated while on-prem stays manual.

Top alternatives to Lumos on the market right now

Lumos mainly works for cloud-first companies, but other platforms made different choices about what to prioritize.

Some focus on enterprise governance with deeper compliance tools and broader infrastructure support, while others compete on AI-powered automation that predicts risks and recommends policies.

A few try to bridge traditional and modern approaches. Which alternative fits depends on your environment and what Lumos can’t handle.

These are the top alternatives to Lumos for 2026:

1. ConductorOne

2. BetterCloud

3. CloudEagle

4. Zluri

5. SailPoint

6. Productiv

7. Zylo

8. Trelica

9. Torii

10. Okta

11. Nudge Security

     

1. ConductorOne

ConductorOne is a modern, AI-native identity governance platform that secures and manages access across cloud and on-premises environments for all identity types.

Where Lumos approaches governance through the lens of SaaS cost management and IT efficiency, ConductorOne treats identity as the foundation of security.

Security and IT teams get direct integration to applications and infrastructure through 300+ out-of-the-box connectors that pull granular identity and access data most SaaS management tools simply don’t access.

If ConductorOne doesn’t have an integration you need, custom connectors can be quickly configured for any system, including homegrown applications and legacy tools lacking modern APIs. Developers can also build their own connectors using ConductorOne’s open-source software development kit (SDK).

ConductorOne uses AI and automation to streamline workflows and recommend actions that help security teams move fast without sacrificing control. The platform keeps things simple for end users while providing admins the flexibility and depth they need for complex governance.

Key features

• Just-in-time access for reducing standing privileges: ConductorOne automates provisioning of temporary access that’s automatically removed after the specified duration, so there’s no need for manual revocation.
• AI agents for smart automation: Users can assign AI agents to analyze access requests and reviews, route approvals, and provide context-aware recommendations to reviewers based on security policies and access patterns.
• Unified Identity Graph for identity intelligence: ConductorOne consolidates permission and access data from across your environment into a single pane of glass, so you can understand who has access to which resources and why.
• Intelligent access reviews for faster, more accurate audits: ConductorOne’s access reviews streamline review scoping and preparation, automate routine tasks, and provide insights that allow admins and reviewers to cut review time and effort while improving audit outcomes.
• End-to-end lifecycle management: ConductorOne’s dynamic access controls and no-code workflows fully automate joiner-mover-leaver processes.
• Non-human identity governance: The system discovers and catalogs machine identities, including service accounts, API keys, OAuth tokens, and AI agents, then assigns ownership to specific individuals for governance.
• 300+ connectors with fast setup: ConductorOne integrates SaaS and IaaS, directories, HR tools, and legacy and homegrown applications with quick-to-deploy connectors that avoid lengthy integration projects.

Why do companies choose ConductorOne over Lumos?

• Security-first approach: ConductorOne prioritizes identity security and governance over cost savings, making it the better choice for organizations where security leads the buying decision.
• Deeper integrations: ConductorOne connects directly to cloud and on-prem apps and infrastructure with 300+ connectors and quick custom integrations. Lumos functions primarily as an Okta overlay with limited direct provisioning, especially for on-premises applications.
• Flexible policy configuration: ConductorOne offers sophisticated multistep and conditional policies for access approvals, reviews, and revocations. Lumos has less-flexible policies and less-mature governance capabilities.
• Better user experience: The platform provides an intuitive interface that both end users and security engineers find simple to use. Based on the reviews, Lumos can sometimes feel counterintuitive, and end-user actions often come with manual backend work.
• Enterprise-ready scalability: ConductorOne processes reviews and workflows for tens of thousands of users smoothly. Lumos experiences timeouts on reviews with 1,000+ users and sometimes needs two-day sync cycles for new Okta applications and groups.

What real customers are saying about ConductorOne

System1 faced an urgent SOX compliance deadline after going public, complicated by visibility gaps across systems from multiple acquisitions. The company got ConductorOne running in three weeks and reduced quarterly audit prep from several weeks to one day through automated reviews.

Fast-growing fintech companies face similar time drains. Ramp burned 40-50 hours each quarter manually collecting access review data across 200+ resources. ConductorOne cut IT effort on access requests by 95% and automated Ramp’s quarterly compliance reviews.

“The onboarding process was smooth. We were able to get our systems integrated within three weeks thanks to great documentation.” — Paul Yoo, Head of Security Assurance

DigitalOcean burned hundreds of hours each quarter on manual spreadsheet data collection and manager follow-ups for access reviews.

With ConductorOne, they completed 1,200 reviews using 85% less effort and reached 100% on-time completion for SOC2 and SOX audits.

2. BetterCloud

BetterCloud provides a full SaaS management platform that handles discovery, workflow automation, permission management, and file governance through a unified interface.

The no-code workflow builder automates complex multi-app processes while the platform tracks everything from shadow IT to license utilization.

Teams usually choose BetterCloud over Lumos when they need deeper operational control, sophisticated workflow automation, and file-level governance alongside access management.

Key features

• Cross-app workflow automation: Build complex, multi-step workflows across dozens of SaaS applications without writing code. The platform handles tasks like reassigning Google Workspace groups, transferring file ownership, and wiping devices remotely through a single automated process.
• Comprehensive SaaS discovery and spend optimization: Automatically detect sanctioned and unsanctioned applications, including AI tools, flag redundant subscriptions, and compare costs against industry benchmarks.
• Zero trust security implementation: Enforce security policies consistently across your entire SaaS portfolio, manage device trust levels, implement conditional access controls, and maintain detailed audit logs.

Limitations

• Poor information display: Report titles and fields show only partial information instead of the full text. This makes scanning through data frustrating since you can’t tell what you’re looking at without opening each item separately. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Overwhelming interface for new users: The tools take considerable time to learn before you can build automated workflows. Teams face a prolonged ramp-up period where the interface feels confusing and feature-dense before becoming productive. [Read Full G2 Review]
• The platform’s complexity may limit accessibility: Complex configurations and deeper platform capabilities need IT expertise to implement properly. [Read Full G2 Review]

Pricing

BetterCloud uses custom quote-based pricing that scales with the number of users and applications under management. The platform targets mainly mid-market to enterprise organizations.

3. CloudEagle

CloudEagle provides SaaS management and identity governance with integrated spend optimization and assisted buying services.

Where Lumos focuses on access workflows, CloudEagle extends into contract management, license optimization, and hands-on buying support.

Key features

• Automated identity lifecycle and access governance: Teams can provision and deprovision users automatically through no-code Slack workflows that integrate with HRIS systems.
• AI-powered price benchmarking and negotiation support: Access real-time pricing insights from 2 billion+ transactions across 150,000 vendors to compare your costs against market rates.
• Contract and renewal orchestration: You can centralize all vendor contracts with automated metadata extraction, proactive renewal alerts with escalation workflows, and full visibility into terms and termination dates.

Limitations

• Incomplete data fields and limited guidance: The platform leaves some data fields blank without clear explanations of what information belongs there or why it matters.
• Steep initial learning curve: Some new users find the platform overwhelming when they first start testing its features and capabilities.
• Data visualization needs improvement: The platform relies heavily on tables and lists rather than visual comparisons and charts. Teams might struggle to quickly understand spend patterns and usage trends without more graphic representations of the data.

Pricing

CloudEagle offers three modules you can buy separately or together – SaaS Management (spend optimization), SaaS Governance (access control), and SaaS Procurement (buying support).

Pricing scales are based on employee count, but aren’t published publicly.

4. Zluri

Zluri built its identity governance capabilities on top of its original SaaS management foundation, which means it treats app visibility and user access as equally important.

Organizations mainly pick Zluri when they want quicker provisioning, comprehensive spend tracking, and automated reviews that tie governance directly to cost control.

Key features

• Self-service access requests through Slack: Employees browse and request applications directly in Slack, where approval workflows route to appropriate managers automatically.
• Patented multi-method discovery engine: Teams can identify every application through nine detection methods that include direct API integrations, SSO connections, finance system analysis, browser and desktop agents, CASB data, and MDM integrations.
• Instant lifecycle automation with sub-hour processing: Provision new hires and deprovision departing employees within minutes.

Limitations

• Chrome browser dependency for full discovery: The browser agent that tracks application usage only works with Chrome profiles. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Delayed dashboard updates: Analytics reports take time to refresh, which creates a lag between actual activity and what appears in the interface. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Missing integrations for niche applications: Many systems lack pre-built connectors despite the 300+ integration library, especially specialized or industry-specific tools. Teams wait for future development roadmap releases to get full coverage of their application stack. [Read Full G2 Review]

Pricing

Zluri’s pricing model depends on your employee count, the applications you need to manage, and which modules you choose.

To get a quote, you’ll need to reach out to their sales team directly.

5. SailPoint

SailPoint is a comprehensive enterprise IGA solution that uses its Atlas-based Identity Security Cloud to combine identity, security, and data intelligence in a single platform.

This alternative serves a different market than Lumos and targets companies that need serious compliance frameworks, deep SAP integration, and governance that handles regulations across multiple countries.

Key features

• Unified governance across all identity types: You can manage human employees, machine identities (service accounts, bots, and shared accounts), AI agents, and non-employee workers (contractors, consultants, and partners) from one platform.
• Enterprise-scale integration library: Connects to 99% of applications through pre-built connectors, including deep SAP integrations, major cloud-based providers, privileged access management systems like CyberArk, and legacy systems through JDBC for custom connections.
• Observability and graph-based intelligence: Teams can visualize identity relationships and access paths through graph-based mapping that shows exactly who or what can reach specific entitlements.

Limitations

• Support prefers email over calls: The support team resists phone conversations and pushes for email-based troubleshooting instead. Issues that could be resolved in a 10-minute call drag on for days or weeks through back-and-forth messages. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Custom configurations increase upgrade difficulty: Organizations that leverage extensive customization options find themselves locked into complex implementations. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Extended wait times for roadmap items: Features that appear on the roadmap take considerably longer to materialize than expected. This gap between announcement and delivery frustrates organizations that structured their governance strategies around upcoming capabilities. [Read Full G2 Review]

Pricing

There’s no public pricing available from SailPoint, so contacting sales is the only way to get an official quote.

However, some third-party estimates share annual costs of approximately $75,000 for small deployments, $240,000 for medium-sized organizations, and $800,000 or more for large enterprises.

Learn more → 10 Best SailPoint Alternatives (Rated by User Reviews) - ConductorOne

6. Productiv

Productiv is a SaaS management platform that tracks feature-level usage to show how employees use applications on a daily basis. The platform analyzes billions of micro-interactions across 50+ dimensions and combines this with contract data to deliver what they call “SaaS Intelligence.”

Compared to Lumos, Productiv only analyzes how applications get used and helps optimize spend. It doesn’t provision access, manage identities, or handle governance workflows.

Key features

• AI-driven shadow IT and Shadow AI discovery: The platform automatically detects unauthorized applications and AI tools that employees use outside official channels.
• App Procurement Hub for cross-team collaboration: You can centralize purchase requests, renewals, and approvals in structured workflows that connect procurement, finance, IT, and department heads.
• Feature-level engagement analytics across 50+ dimensions: Productiv analyzes billions of micro-interactions to show which features teams use and how usage patterns change over time.

Limitations

• Unclear documentation for advanced features: The platform’s more sophisticated capabilities lack clear explanations and guidance for users. [Read Full G2 Review]
• No built-in budget forecasting tools: The platform collects all the data needed to project future SaaS spending, but lacks native forecasting. Some users say they have to export information to external spreadsheets to build annual budget plans and expense projections. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Support availability limited to offshore hours: The customer support team operates outside standard US business hours, which can often create delays. Users often bypass the support queue and contact their CSM directly for time-sensitive problems that need immediate attention. [Read Full G2 Review]

Pricing

Productiv doesn’t publish pricing publicly and uses custom quotes based on employee count and portfolio size.

Implementation fees and add-ons like Elastic License Management may increase total costs. You should contact Productiv sales for a quote specific to your organization.

7. Zylo

Zylo is an enterprise SaaS management platform that uses AI-powered discovery to identify applications and track spending across organizations.

While both Zylo and Lumos manage SaaS portfolios, Zylo focuses heavily on financial optimization and renewal management, while Lumos targets access requests and user provisioning.

Key features

• AI-powered discovery with 100% accuracy claims: The platform uses machine learning models trained on nearly a decade of SaaS transaction data to identify and categorize applications across your environment.
• Comprehensive renewal calendar and contract management: You can consolidate all SaaS contracts, renewal dates, and key terms in one system that alerts teams months before renewals.
• Enterprise API and ITSM integrations: Connect Zylo’s SaaS data to finance, service management, and security tools through a flexible API that feeds information into systems like Jira, ServiceNow, and financial platforms.

Limitations

• Inconsistent data in multi-entity organizations: Organizations with complex structures find that the platform can’t keep information accurate despite good integrations. [Read Full G2 Review]
• No merge fields in notification templates: Renewal reminder messages lack the flexibility to include custom data or personalize content for recipients. Teams can’t add variables or tailor communications to specific contexts. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Poor filtering UX and email presentation: Users find filtering so cumbersome that they download reports and work in Excel instead of using platform tools. The automated emails look suspicious enough that employees sometimes mistake them for scams. [Read Full G2 Review]

Pricing

Zylo uses custom pricing that isn’t listed publicly. Tiered packages offer different levels of automation, and professional services for negotiations cost extra. You can get a quote from Zylo sales based on your needs.

8. Trelica

Trelica is a SaaS management platform built for collaboration between IT and business teams. 1Password acquired Trelica in January 2025 and added identity management to its toolkit.

Trelica also mainly focuses on SaaS portfolio management and license optimization, similar to Productiv and Zylo, not on identity lifecycle or governance workflows.

Key features

• Automated discovery through multiple data sources: The identity platform pulls application data from identity providers, expense systems, browser extensions, and HR integrations to build a complete SaaS inventory.
• No-code workflow builder with Slack and Teams integration: You can create custom workflows for user provisioning, offboarding, access requests, and renewal management without writing code.
• Searchable app catalog for approved tools: Share a directory of sanctioned applications with all employees to drive adoption of IT-approved tools. The catalog also includes clear paths to request access through approval chains.

Limitations

• Limited flexibility in app comparison tool: The comparison feature only works with applications that the platform recommends automatically. Users can’t select which specific apps to compare against each other, which restricts analysis when you want to evaluate tools outside the pre-selected options. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Feature set and integrations incomplete: The platform hasn’t reached full coverage across all SaaS applications and management use cases yet. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Finance integration mandatory for spend tracking: The platform can’t track spending properly without connecting to external finance applications. Teams without these integrations resort to manual spreadsheet uploads and monthly reporting, which defeats the automation purpose. [Read Full G2 Review]

Pricing

You won’t find standard pricing tiers for Trelica. The platform follows an enterprise sales model, meaning you’ll have to speak with their team to learn what it costs for your specific use case.

9. Torii

Torii is another comprehensive SaaS management platform that combines discovery, spend optimization, and identity governance into a unified system.

In 2025, Torii also released its Eko agentic platform, which brings AI-powered execution directly into the interface so teams can ask natural language questions and take action without switching between tools.

Key features

• Automated access reviews with HRMS and SSO integration: The platform pulls data from your HR systems and identity providers to validate user access automatically. Managers see who has access to applications and can revoke permissions with a few clicks, and everything gets documented for audit trails.
• Agentic AI with Torii Eko: Teams can query the platform using natural language questions like “Which apps pose the highest security risk?” or “Where are we overspending?” and get immediate answers.
• Comprehensive shadow IT and Shadow AI discovery: Torii can find unauthorized apps across multiple detection methods, including browser extensions, SSO analysis, finance integrations, and direct API connections.

Limitations

• Limited cloud infrastructure coverage: The integration catalog focuses heavily on SaaS apps but leaves gaps for teams that need to manage AWS, Azure, or cloud security platforms alongside their software portfolio. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Workflows break down with complex scenarios: Standard automation works fine, but the platform struggles when provisioning gets complicated or license reconciliation involves multiple steps. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Reports don’t customize easily: The platform generates useful reports but won’t let you build the exact dashboards executives want to see. Teams can’t slice data across multiple dimensions or create custom visualizations without exporting everything to spreadsheets. [Read Full G2 Review]

Pricing

Torii splits its platform into two packages – IGA for identity governance and SMP for SaaS spend management.

Both use custom pricing based on your organization’s size and needs. You’ll need to contact their sales team for a quote.

10. Okta

Okta Identity Governance extends the company’s existing single sign-on (SSO) platform with full governance features like automated certifications, entitlement management, and lifecycle automation.

While Okta is an identity provider and Lumos is a SaaS management platform, they compete in the provisioning and governance space. Most organizations layer Lumos on top of Okta, but some use Okta’s governance tools alone as a basic alternative.

Key features

• Access certifications with contextual intelligence: Campaigns run on recurring schedules or trigger in response to security events, and reviewers see contextual information like sign-in frequency and last access dates alongside permission data.
• Unified lifecycle management and workflows: The platform automates provisioning and deprovisioning through native integrations with HR systems, cloud applications, and on-premises infrastructure.
• Resource collections and ownership assignment: The platform lets you combine apps and entitlements into collections that get assigned as units. You can assign resource owners who automatically become approvers for access requests and certification reviews.

Limitations

• Customization hits walls without developer resources: Basic branding controls work fine, but deeper customization needs technical resources that most teams don’t have. You can’t build sophisticated multi-factor authentication (MFA) policies or custom login flows through the admin console alone. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Complex implementation demands identity expertise: Initial setup drags on longer than teams expect, particularly for organizations that lack IAM specialists. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Email-based OTP delivery creates access friction: The email verification system causes problems when codes arrive late, land in spam folders, or don’t show up at all. Users get locked out of critical systems while waiting for authentication emails that may never arrive. [Read Full G2 Review]

Pricing

The Essentials Suite from Okta costs $17 per user per month (annual commitment) and includes Identity Governance alongside Access Governance, Lifecycle Management, and 50 Workflows.

Identity Governance can’t be purchased separately — you’ll need to buy a suite package with at least $1,500 in annual spend.

11. Nudge Security

Nudge Security is a security-focused alternative to Lumos that prioritizes governance and risk management over spend optimization.

The platform finds shadow IT through a patented identity-based method that scans email inboxes and OAuth grants.

Key features

• SaaS supply chain risk management: The platform maps third-party and fourth-party integrations across your SaaS ecosystem and then alerts you immediately when vendors in your supply chain experience breaches.
• Historical spend discovery and cost optimization: Nudge Security extracts two years of invoice data from user mailboxes within minutes of setup, so it can outline shadow spend that finance systems miss.
• Workflow orchestration for governance tasks: Pre-built playbooks automate employee offboarding, access reviews, SSO enrollment tracking, and SOC 2 compliance tasks.

Limitations

• Limited feature depth compared to established vendors: The platform doesn’t match the full feature sets of older competitors. Development moves quickly to close these gaps, though teams might wait for specific capabilities. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Contact identification logic produces wrong results: Nudge Security picks technical contacts by analyzing support interactions, but this approach flags end users who need help rather than the admins who own the platforms. [Read Full G2 Review]
• Success depends on organizational follow-through: Installing Nudge Security doesn’t automatically streamline security. Teams must actively engage with the platform’s recommendations and build processes around the behavioral nudges to see results. [Read Full G2 Review]

Pricing

Nudge Security bases its pricing on your number of active Google Workspace or Microsoft 365 user accounts. From there, you can add advanced security features for specific apps if needed.

• Teams with 150-2,500 accounts: $5 per active user per month
• Teams under 150 users: $750 flat monthly fee
• Teams over 2,500 accounts: Contact sales for custom pricing
• Advanced security features: Add $50 per month per app

ConductorOne – the #1 Lumos alternative

ConductorOne brings enterprise-grade identity governance without the complexity of legacy IGA systems or the limitations of SaaS management tools.

The platform prioritizes security over cost optimization, connects directly to infrastructure and apps that other tools can’t reach, and scales to handle tens of thousands of users without performance issues.

The platform comes with capabilities that SaaS management tools simply can’t match:

• Just-in-time access grants temporary permissions that expire automatically, which reduces standing privileges and limits security exposure.
• AI agents analyze access requests and reviews and provide context-aware recommendations based on policy rules and historical patterns.
• Unified Identity Graph consolidates permission data from every system into one view that shows who has access to what and why.
• Full lifecycle automation provisions new hires, adjusts access during role changes, and deprovisions departing employees automatically.
• Intelligent access reviews streamline compliance audits with flexible scoping options, automated review routing, risk-based recommendations for reviewers, and one-click reporting.
• Non-human identity governance discovers and manages service accounts, API keys, and AI agents across your entire environment.
• 300+ connectors integrate with cloud, on-premises, and homegrown applications through a lightweight setup that deploys in minutes to days.

Take Instacart as an example. They needed to comply with SOX regulations and secure privileged access, but their manual, manager-based approval system was slow and lacked oversight across their distributed infrastructure.

ConductorOne allowed them to move 100% of privileged access to policy-based just-in-time provisioning, which got rid of approval bottlenecks, freed up engineering time, and tightened security controls.

If your current identity governance approach can’t keep up with your infrastructure complexity or growth, ConductorOne offers a faster path forward.

Book a demo to see how the platform fits your environment.

FAQs

Do I need an all-in-one platform or a best-of-breed solution?

It depends on what you need to govern and how deep you need to go. All-in-one platforms like Lumos work well if you primarily manage SaaS applications and want complete visibility into software spend alongside basic access controls.

Best-of-breed identity governance platforms like ConductorOne make sense when you need to secure infrastructure, on-premises systems, and fine-grained permissions that SaaS management tools can’t reach.

My IdP already handles identity management. Why do I need another tool?

Your IdP authenticates users and manages basic access, but it doesn’t govern what happens after login or handle the full lifecycle of permissions.

Identity governance platforms like ConductorOne automate access reviews, enforce just-in-time access, manage approvals, and provide more granular insights into who has access to what across all your systems (not just the apps connected to your IdP).

Most organizations use infrastructure, legacy applications, and homegrown tools that operate outside their IdP entirely, which means you need a layer above authentication that governs access and maintains least privilege across your entire environment.

Can SaaS management tools like Lumos handle high-risk or privileged access?

SaaS management tools mainly focus on application-level access and license optimization, not the granular privilege controls security teams need for high-risk systems.

Lumos works primarily through your IdP to manage Okta groups and SaaS entitlements, which doesn’t give you the fine-grained permissions, just-in-time access, or infrastructure-level controls needed for privileged access and asset management.

If you need to govern admin access to AWS, database permissions, or service account credentials (the kind of privileged access that poses the biggest security risk), you need a specialized identity governance platform built for that depth.